User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Wekelwrady (talk | contribs)
12,332 edits
 
(154 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#Do not type any nonsense messages
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.


Thanks
Thanks


==Opinion==
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]
Hi,


Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.
==Bus Redeployments (TBC)==
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:


To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.
*SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected)
*SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A)
===Others===
* '''Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover)''': Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected


Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: [[Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)]]. Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.
==Disrupting sgWiki users==
Hi,


As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: [[Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1]], incorporating your valuable feedback.
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by [[User:Kimminju|@Kimminju]] for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
# delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
# ban any user
# revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages


Please confirm if the following criteria are met:
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.
# Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
# Ease of information references.


If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.
Please wait for other admins to support your request.


Regards, Supernutorcrazy
Thank you for your understanding.


==Concern regarding SBS6709B on routes 129 and 293==
Regards


I edited the page because someone informed me that he was in a Discord server where a user once claimed that SBS6709B was always seen on route 129 instead of route 293, and that they take route 129 everyday.
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)


Please check again on your edits. Thanks. GyecheonSageori (aka Gye) ([[User Talk:GyecheonSageori|talk,]]) 14:15, 31 December 2024 (+08)
== Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links ==


== Shift away from images with middle watermarks ==
Hi,
 
Hi Alphabetlorefan1,
 
Good to see you having a portion of good images uploaded!
 
To also let you know that non-watermarked images are also in the making - so if you need any images for any new bus service pages, do let me know, I will upload in due course.


Thanks and Regards
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Latest revision as of 19:46, 27 April 2026

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
  5. Don't troll me

Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.

Thanks

Bus Redeployments (TBC)

Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:

  • SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected)
  • SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A)

Others

  • Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover): Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected

Disrupting sgWiki users

Hi,

I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to

  1. delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
  2. ban any user
  3. revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages

Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.

Please wait for other admins to support your request.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)

Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links

Hi,

Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Alphabetlorefan1&oldid=727877"