(116 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 7:
Line 7:
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#Don't troll me
#Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.
Thanks
Thanks
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]
== Notice of Free to use Sgwiki images for svc 10x series ==
==Bus Redeployments (TBC)==
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:
*SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
*SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
*SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
*SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
*SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)
==Disrupting sgWiki users==
Hi,
Hi,
To support and help speed up your work, the following images are free for your use.
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by [[User:Kimminju|@Kimminju]] for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
# delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
# ban any user
# revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages
File:SBS8650Y 100.jpg <br>
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.
File:SBS8162P 101.jpg <br>
File:SG5956Y 102.jpg <br>
File:SBS8680K 103.jpg <br>
File:SG3023C 105.jpg (permission sorted out and asked from owner) <br>
File:SG3105A 107.jpg <br>
File:SG6356Y 107M.jpg <br>
File:SBS7608C 109.jpg <br>
This is to increase productivity for work on the new bus service pages and decreases the time needed to search for other images online.
Please wait for other admins to support your request.
I will also work on speeding up the upgrade of bus stop templates.
Thank you for your understanding.
One more thing to add on, images should have destinations displayed, not just numbers or greetings.
Regards
Thanks and Regards
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)
<!-- Remember to ask for permission as the images are coming in large quantities from one photographer. You may not know the owners' reaction when he/she finds out alot of their pics are uploaded onto the wiki !-->
== Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links ==
===Update===
Hi, this is to fully confirm that you can start work on 100, 105, 107/M and 109. Thanks and Regards
===Reply===
Hi,
Hi,
Thanks for the heads up. If you have time to spare, would appreciate your assistance in upgrading other bus service pages.
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?
Thanks and Regards
== Stop undoing edits to my talk page. ==
I have read your edits to my talk page, can you please stop undoing them FFS? I get really annoyed if you revert edits to my talk page and I have already mentioned in the edit summary that I have read and understood them.
== Controversial edit on Alexander Dennis Enviro500 3-Door ==
Please do not introduce controversial material into articles without first discussing it on the article's talk page. Your edits may appear to some to be vandalism and disruptive, and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Regards,
== Edit warring ==
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
CastJared, add in something about edit war.
See there:
An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions. Editors engaged in a dispute should reach consensus or pursue dispute resolution rather than edit war. Edit warring is unconstructive, creates animosity between editors, makes consensus harder to reach, and causes confusion for readers. Users who engage in edit warring risk being blocked or even banned. An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.
There is a bright line known as the three-revert rule (3RR). To revert is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot will usually be considered edit warring. There are certain exemptions to the three-revert rule, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the policy on biographies of living persons; see below for details. The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:
No spamming
Be respectful to me
Do not type any nonsense messages
If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.
Thanks
Bus Redeployments (TBC)
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:
SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)
Disrupting sgWiki users
Hi,
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
ban any user
revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.
Please wait for other admins to support your request.
