User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
→Lets sum this up: new section
 
(106 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
#Don't troll me
#Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.


Thanks
Thanks


== Re: Evaluation on 117/M ==
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]
 
==Bus Redeployments (TBC)==
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:
 
*SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
*SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
*SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
*SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
*SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)


Hi Alphabetlorefan1,
==Disrupting sgWiki users==
Hi,


Would like to approach you for an evaluation on the possibility of creating 117/M under one single page, as you have expressed interest in completing 117/M.
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by [[User:Kimminju|@Kimminju]] for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
# delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
# ban any user
# revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages


As 117A is running during 117M operating hours but counted as a short-trip service under 117, there may be an instance of confusion, given that 117 starts later on paper. Furthermore, 117 and 117M's only difference is in Seletar, in which both routes may not see any long-term amendments other than Seletar. Hence, the table below attempts to address the difference with alternate operating hours by the parent route and route variant under one combined page.  
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.


I am currently also waiting for admin's response before I proceed to create other services that fall under the same example with 117/M. Do share your opinions and thoughts on the idea. Thanks.
Please wait for other admins to support your request.


{| class='wikitable' style='text-align:center;'
Thank you for your understanding.
!Departure Period<br>(Weekdays)
!Service Available
!Passing through
|-
|<font size=3>05:30 – 08:00</font>
|<font size=5>'''117M'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* '''Seletar Aerospace Crescent'''
* '''Seletar Aerospace Link'''
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|-
|<font size=3>08:15 – 16:50</font>
|<font size=5>'''117'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|-
|<font size=3>17:00 – 19:00</font>
|<font size=5>'''117M'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* '''Seletar Aerospace Crescent '''
* '''Seletar Aerospace Link'''
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|-
|<font size=3>19:15 – 23:30</font>
|<font size=5>'''117'''</font>
|style='text-align:left;'|
* West Camp Road
* Seletar Aerospace Drive
|}


<div class="mw-collapsible">
Regards
<p class='exc'>[Show/Hide Full Route Details]</p>
{| class="wikitable"
!rowspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Bus Stops
!rowspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Point of Interest
!colspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Weekdays
!colspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Saturdays
!colspan=2 style='{{CSS/BUS|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Suns / PHs
|-
!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|First bus!!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Last bus
!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|First bus!!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Last bus
!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|First bus!!style='{{CSS/LTA|xfc=|xbc=}}'|Last bus
|-
|{{BS68181|swt=<br><font size=3>'''<center>({{Bus/117|a=M}} only)</center>'''</font>}}
{{Bus/FBLB|05:50/08:23<br>(117M)|17:24/19:23<br>(117M)|sa=|su=|fr=}}
|colspan=4 {{N/A}}
|}


== Lets sum this up ==
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)


Good to see you having a batch of images you uploaded. But due to some reasons, you have to be aware of something because one of them told me everything in my talk page.
== Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links ==


With this, we recommend you to read this: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CA2021 and https://support.google.com/legal/answer/3463239?hl=en
Hi,


Before you can proceed off, ah my brain feels relaxed
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Latest revision as of 00:32, 6 November 2025

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
  5. Don't troll me

Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.

Thanks

Bus Redeployments (TBC)

Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:

  • SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
  • SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
  • SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
  • SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
  • SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)

Disrupting sgWiki users

Hi,

I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to

  1. delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
  2. ban any user
  3. revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages

Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.

Please wait for other admins to support your request.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)

Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links

Hi,

Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Alphabetlorefan1&oldid=710563"