User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tag: Manual revert
 
(90 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]
[[File:SG5023P 21.jpg|thumb|centre|250px]]


== 258/M ==
==Bus Redeployments (TBC)==
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:


Hi Alphabetlorefan1,
*SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
*SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
*SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
*SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
*SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)


I suggest putting the idea on hold but keep it at the same time in case any changes occur. There might be changes in the short term, which is also why 181/M has not got the same merger as of now.
==Disrupting sgWiki users==
Hi,


Thanks and Regards
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by [[User:Kimminju|@Kimminju]] for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
# delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
# ban any user
# revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages


== Image quality ==
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.


I'd like to clarify that I don't think I've ever directly said your images are low quality, but rather I said the replacements are of higher quality, as in a comparative sense; there's quite a distinction between these two (to provide an analogy, I would also admit that LTG/Singapore Buses images are also of higher quality than mine, but that doesn't automatically mean my images low quality). However since you asked for feedback, I’ll highlight a few shortcomings. For instance, night shots like [https://sgwiki.com/wiki/File:SBS3T_382G.jpg] can sometimes produce prominent light rays or glare, which may distract from the bus itself. Similarly, in [https://sgwiki.com/wiki/File:SBS6841B_148.jpg], while important details like the EDS and plate are readable, there are some visible artifacts and colour distortions that affect the overall clarity—such as the destination sign showing different shades of yellow/orange. These may understandably appear as minor issues, but when they are placed as infobox images and thus appear on other sites such as Google search, it is details like these that contribute to the reader’s experience.
Please wait for other admins to support your request.


Out of potential neutrality concerns from human bias, I asked ChatGPT to provide feedback and comparison for each pair of photos. You can view their feedback here [https://imgur.com/a/NzponVl]. I should also make it clear that this message is not intended to stop you from taking photos, but I would rather help you to watch out for shortcomings so that you can improve further. Rome isn't built in one day after all.
Thank you for your understanding.


Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions.
Regards
 
TTEDC


=== Word of Encouragement ===
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)


I would also like to take this opportunity to say that your Service 146 and 148 photos have been a huge improvement compared to the other photos that you have taken. Keep up the good work, I believe in you!
== Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links ==


==Re:Photos in subpage==
Hi,
Hi,


I see no harm, in fact this would be normally approved.
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?
 
Regards
 
[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 20:11, 2 May 2025 (+08)

Latest revision as of 00:32, 6 November 2025

About Me

Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:

  1. No spamming
  2. Be respectful to me
  3. Do not type any nonsense messages
  4. If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
  5. Don't troll me

Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.

Thanks

Bus Redeployments (TBC)

Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:

  • SG5991U - UPDEP 51 > UPDEP 132
  • SG6187T - UPDEP 132 > UPDEP 51
  • SBS8619P - UPDEP 123 > UPDEP 123M (While 123 and 123M SDs are interchangeable, I have seen this bus doing 123M a lot)
  • SG3261G - GBDEP 75 > GBDEP 927 (KIV whether SG3259P is redeployed to 927 or still perm 75)
  • SG3311X & SG3312T - GBDEP SP > GBDEP 920 (Should be immediately perm 920 since debut)

Disrupting sgWiki users

Hi,

I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to

  1. delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
  2. ban any user
  3. revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages

Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.

Please wait for other admins to support your request.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards

Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)

Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links

Hi,

Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?