User talk:Alphabetlorefan1: Difference between revisions
m →Others |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments: | Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments: | ||
*SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 | *SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected) | ||
*SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A) | *SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A) | ||
===Others=== | |||
* '''Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover)''': Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected | |||
==Disrupting sgWiki users== | ==Disrupting sgWiki users== | ||
Latest revision as of 19:46, 27 April 2026
About Me
Hey, its Alphabetlorefan1. If you have any questions or any necessary stuff, you can leave it here until I respond. But wait, before you leave a message here, read this first:
- No spamming
- Be respectful to me
- Do not type any nonsense messages
- If I did not reply to your message, that means I am busy
- Don't troll me
Do take note that I will be deleting messages after 2 weeks.
Thanks
Bus Redeployments (TBC)
Note: This is a section where I have spotted buses that it's redeployed to another service as seen 2 or 3 times by suspect. I cant confirm it either yet until I have spotted it again. Editors can also help me with this, even if it is confirmed, leave a reply here. Thanks. Here are the suspected redeployments:
- SMB1376U - GBDEP 188 > GBDEP 61 (SMB1376U was spotted 4 times on a same slot since 26 March, spotted it again yesterday, but its still suspected)
- SG3357P - GBDEP 970 > GBDEP 188 (KIV other SG335x BYDs are out of 970. Some of these buses also redeployed to 188 or another svc, like SG3353A)
Others
- Suspected crossover from 35 to 7 (35x7 Crossover): Can someone help me check if the 35x7 crossover exist? Because today I saw one bus of the same rego on 35 and 7. Likely, SG6169X, I spotted the bus on 35 around 1pm at Bedok Interchange and later when I was at Dhoby Ghaut at 7pm, SG6169X is now on 7 heading towards Bedok. I know this bus rego perms 168, to replace one of the 35 perm, but help me verify if this crossover exists. It's highly suspected
Disrupting sgWiki users
Hi,
I had noticed the growing disruptive user editing in sgWiki, but unfortunately, I was given a "ban" by @Kimminju for saying I abusing my admin right to disrupt the editing and should focus on sgWiki @ Miraheze. I seek your understanding that I will not be able to
- delete any sgwiki Buses Main Page (except for the pages due for migration)
- ban any user
- revert/edit/correct/sync deployments pages
Therefore, I will be focusing on proper data control and syncing to sgWiki @ Miraheze.
Please wait for other admins to support your request.
Thank you for your understanding.
Regards
Supernutorcrazy (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2025 (+08)
Growing number of advertising accounts with unsafe links
Hi,
Do I just remove the unsafe link from the userpage or all the content like what you did?