Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS9631X"
(→Sorry for all the undoing, hope you understand: new section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi | Hi, | ||
I | Thanks for the clarification. Sorry that I am not able to reply as soon as possible as I promised. You know that I have been focusing much on SGForums these days where I often give much insider information about buses. Though at times when this website needs assistance, I'll be here to help :) | ||
SMB1368T | SMB1368T | ||
Revision as of 21:20, 14 September 2016
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification. Sorry that I am not able to reply as soon as possible as I promised. You know that I have been focusing much on SGForums these days where I often give much insider information about buses. Though at times when this website needs assistance, I'll be here to help :)
SMB1368T
Sorry for all the undoing, hope you understand
Hi,
I understand you have had a busy time editing the pages, and would like to apologise for the undoing of pages, but 118alex's edits do have errors such as SBS5M and some other buses in the Citaro pages. The Citaro Batch 2 is a particularly difficult page to work with if the deployments are erroneous and hence I chosen to undo it so that it doesn't affect the Buses in depots section when the correct info comes in.
Sorry for all these trouble but hope you understand. :)
--Scania 17:47, 5 September 2016 (SGT)