Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"
m (Not My Business if using VPN.) |
|||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Hi, may I know the reason why my edits to [[North South Line]] were edited. It didnt to my knowledge violate any policy as it was not violating any copyright rules, was not vandalism or spam, is factually accurate, and was supported by references. Regards -[[User:TrainAddict|TrainAddict]] ([[User talk:TrainAddict|talk]]) 21:44, 1 July 2018 (+08) | Hi, may I know the reason why my edits to [[North South Line]] were edited. It didnt to my knowledge violate any policy as it was not violating any copyright rules, was not vandalism or spam, is factually accurate, and was supported by references. Regards -[[User:TrainAddict|TrainAddict]] ([[User talk:TrainAddict|talk]]) 21:44, 1 July 2018 (+08) | ||
==Re: Service Recategorisation== | |||
Yup. All Intra-Towns/Townlinks got recategorised except for Townlink 358 & 359 for now. Will make changes for the others first. |
Revision as of 11:58, 12 August 2018
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
- Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
- Please do not ask for permission to do something.
- Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
- When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
- Affected sections code
- Advertisement in full
- Affected parts to change in details.
- Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
Just some clarifications on the Service 37 page
Hey man,
I read your reply on my talk page. After reading the notice again + your reasons, I do agree with your reasons for taking out his edits (to prevent false info). But so, the main issue is with not stating his legitimate email by appealing while registering his account in time?
Regards, SBS9631X
Alternate Bus Service
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
I am writing this to ask whether I should include Niteowl & NightRider Service into the pages. As these services do not operate during normal train service hours, I think that we should not include them into the pages as it has little or no purpose
Regards, Thefoodie
Kembagan MRT/bs 83059 clarification
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
I would like to clarify on the issue of bus stop 83059(Mjd Kassid), located along Changi Rd. Although it is a far distance away from Kembagan MRT Station, can this be marked as an exemption and be called as an MRT bus stop?
Changi Rd(westbound) and Sims Ave East(eastbound) are one-way roads, in which it will not make sense to only specify the alternate bus services along Sims Ave East, and may put people into confusion in implying that there are no alternate westbound bus services. Furthermore, we put into consideration that Mjd Kassid bus stop is the calling point of MRT shuttle 7 towards Paya Lebar, and the bus stop having the Kembagan station name marked right below the stop name. Therefore, in my opinion, 83059 should be a MRT bus stop.
This issue came to my mind while I am doing a draft on Bedok Reservoir station alternate bus services in my user page.
If this can be possible, will you also mind looking into the following stop on Geylang Rd, on whether this should be an exemption and be considered an MRT bus stop? City Plaza(82019) @Paya Lebar
I wish to clarify in case there may be possible false edits that I may not realise, thus writing this.
I apologize should I have anything that I have wrote inappropriately or by mistake/fault, and I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you.
Google, Internet etc. search for train stations
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Should there be an action taken to change in the station name pages to "MRT Station"/"LRT Station"? This is because when most people search for station names in eg. Google, the leading "MRT"/"LRT" wordings are always directly shown to them to choose the search results they want. Furthermore, the Sgwiki Train Staion pages are not on the first few pages of the search results of "XXX MRT", thus viewership for the Sgwiki train station pages may be low. Additionally, since the bus model pages of Sgwiki made it to their respective search results, I believe we can do the same thing to the train station pages, even though it may be time-consuming to change the page names and waiting for the train station pages to be on the first few search result pages.
Thank you and I look forward to hear your perspective on this issue.
Wekelwrady, 12.44pm, 5 Mar 2018
P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?
Regarding my edits
Hi, may I know the reason why my edits to North South Line were edited. It didnt to my knowledge violate any policy as it was not violating any copyright rules, was not vandalism or spam, is factually accurate, and was supported by references. Regards -TrainAddict (talk) 21:44, 1 July 2018 (+08)
Re: Service Recategorisation
Yup. All Intra-Towns/Townlinks got recategorised except for Townlink 358 & 359 for now. Will make changes for the others first.