Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS3107H"
Apex-LW'21 (talk | contribs) |
(→Regarding SBS9296E's status...: new section) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:Apex-LW'21|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21|talk]]) 19:50, 10 June 2014 (SGT) | --[[User:Apex-LW'21|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21|talk]]) 19:50, 10 June 2014 (SGT) | ||
== Regarding SBS9296E's status... == | |||
Greetings. | |||
I noticed that you had edited the list of non-revenue Volvo Olympians following 9385G 9386D 9389X 9391M's de-registration and noticed that 9296E is removed from 'awaiting de-registration' status. I would wish to confirm it against you or any person whom you may perceive as a reliable source; as to whether SBS9296E has been out on the roads sometime after it was spotted in the lay-up corner of BNDEP as mentioned by SgForums user SBS9631X in late-May. | |||
Cheers. |
Revision as of 13:16, 12 June 2014
SgWiki Guidelines
Hi, SBS3107H, apologies in advance if I clear the entire previous talk page.
As I realise that many are made unaware about their edits in sgWiki Buses section, I should come up with a draft of the sgWiki Policies & Guidelines that they have to follow. However, the previous bans that the admins did for offending members are made unaware of, ranging from Inserting false information, removing content from pages, etc.
Though sgWiki is a page where "anyone can edit", just like Wikipedia, it can, at the same time, be possible to abuse to vandalise, insert false information and so on where prohibited. Because these guidelines are not enforced here, there could be some members who would edit whichever is prohibited and got caught on by the admins.
I have done up the new SgWiki Guidelines. If you have any feedbacks/clarifications, you can write on my talk page. Thanks.
--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 19:50, 10 June 2014 (SGT)
Regarding SBS9296E's status...
Greetings.
I noticed that you had edited the list of non-revenue Volvo Olympians following 9385G 9386D 9389X 9391M's de-registration and noticed that 9296E is removed from 'awaiting de-registration' status. I would wish to confirm it against you or any person whom you may perceive as a reliable source; as to whether SBS9296E has been out on the roads sometime after it was spotted in the lay-up corner of BNDEP as mentioned by SgForums user SBS9631X in late-May.
Cheers.