Difference between revisions of "User talk:Scania"
(→With regards to removal of buses on official lay up.: new section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== With regards to removal of buses on official lay up. == | == With regards to removal of buses on official lay up. == | ||
Hi, | |||
I understand that there was such a rule, and I am discussing it with the others on this. | |||
This is because it causes inconvenience later on when the buses come back into service. Hope you understand that, and I hope to get back to you when there is an outcome of the discussion. | |||
--Scania 16:05, 13 August 2016 (SGT) | |||
Greetings. | Greetings. | ||
Revision as of 16:05, 13 August 2016
With regards to removal of buses on official lay up.
Hi,
I understand that there was such a rule, and I am discussing it with the others on this.
This is because it causes inconvenience later on when the buses come back into service. Hope you understand that, and I hope to get back to you when there is an outcome of the discussion.
--Scania 16:05, 13 August 2016 (SGT)
Greetings.
As far as I have been here, there is somewhat an established rule that buses that have already been offcially laid up (not just officially de-registered) tend to be removed from the list in the main deployments page, and their details would be shifted to the non-revenue buses page. That is why I still retained 5026D and 5031M on the page.
However, I acknowledged I haven't been here for some time, so whether such a rule had been changed over the past few months I am not entirely sure. Regardless of whether it is true, I would follow your instructions and let the content stay there as it be.
Cheers.