User talk:SBS3107H

SMRT Buses in Depots

Good Morning SBS3107H,
I will be removing the Bus Plus buses list from the Geylang Bus Park section as I don't think that the list is very well updated. One example is that even a de-registered mini-bus, PH2185E is still reflected on the list.

As such, to prevent sgWiki from retaining such outdated information, the Bus-Plus buses list will be removed and excluded out from the SMRT Buses in Depots page.

Please advise the users to refrain from adding back the Bus-Plus mini-buses on that page.

If you have any questions, feel free to write on my talk page.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2014 (SGT)

Late reply: I noted this move. Thanks. SBS3107H (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2014 (SGT)

Bus(es)

Hi may i know whats the use of it? All the other deployment threads do not have it

--SBS6301T 13:11, 9 August 2014 (SGT)

Late reply: This term will be applied to all pages in the future when the appropriate time comes. SBS3107H (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2014 (SGT)

SMB5001A and SMB5002Y

Hi, SMB5001A and SMB5002Y MAY be parking inside WLBP, but it MAY NOT be WLBP bus still. Recall when SMB137A was in WLDEP for a long period of time even after registration, Thanks.

I did not include "SP" or "TRG" during my editing session for both buses but just the depot initials, WLDEP. But I don't foresee them labelled as empty when they served as Training buses and return to WLBP. SBS3107H (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2014 (SGT)

Bus deployments pages: Bulim Depot is actually Bulim Bus Park.

Greetings.

Based on duty sheets found onboard buses that are under the control of the so-called new Bulim Depot, it has been certified that the buses are actually doing 'Overnight Parking at Bulim Bus Park' as reflected. So essentially the so-called Bulim Depot should be labelled as Bus Park in official. Like the previous time where Woodlands Depot and Woodlands Bus Park buses are interchangable, Kranji Depot and Bulim Bus Park buses are interchangable. Please notify the adminstrator of SgWiki and authorize the changes from all terms of 'Bulim Depot' and 'BLDEP' found in the wiki to 'Bulim Bus Park' and 'BLBP respectively.

Cheers.

Late reply: It has been amended. SBS3107H (talk) 11:36, 25 August 2014 (SGT)

sgwiki Bus Guideline

Hi SBS3107H,

I had include the new guideline (Line 1.5) for it as deemed necessary as of 25 August.

Shiying TW did in fact updated the deployment pages 4 - 5 hours prior to the last bus conclude it shift of the last operation day. However, as there is no guideline saying that this should not be done at that time, it would be wrong for us to issue a warning point/temporary ban to the user.

So I would conclude that the case is closed. Is it ok for you, SBS3107H?Thanks & Regards --Supernutorcrazy (Talk, Adminstrator) 25 August 2014, 10:16 SGT

Agreed. Thanks. SBS3107H (talk) 11:36, 25 August 2014 (SGT)

Woodlands Bus Park & Geylang Bus Park

Please be informed that Woodlands Bus Park will be known as WPDEP and Geylang Bus Park will be known as GYDEP, based on the timesheets.
As for the former deployments and non-revenue buses, should I leave Woodlands Bus Park as WLBP instead? Since they were before the change of the WLBP abbrievation to WPDEP.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 22:02, 3 September 2014 (SGT)

SMB5003U

Thanks. I have added SMB5003U in the Alexander Dennis Enviro500 page.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 18:23, 10 September 2014 (SGT)

Deregistration of MkIVs.

I hope that you could understand the massive edits I did earlier on. Many of the MkIV DM and Striders had undergone early deregistration. But as of now, they are all pulled out of revenue service. Certain buses are already seen replacing the empty slots. I believe it is done to facilitate the input of new buses to HGDEP and BNDEP. Full list of buses that are gone can be seen at http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/485303?page=37 .

If there are any leftover edits that was not done fully, do rectify it.

Hope you can enjoy a nice day.

- SBS2656X (talk) 12:10AM, 20 September 2014 (GMT+8)

Service 201 - 220 deployment page

Hi SBS3107H,

I don't think it would be necessary to implement the above-mentioned page, since there will be no services introduced within the range of 202 to 220.
Hence, I would suggest that the page Services 181 - 200, be moved to the new page, Services 181 - 201, to contain the deployments of the newly-introduced Service 201.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 06:41, 23 November 2014 (SGT)

Hi again,

I have redirected the Services 181 - 200 page, to the new page, Services 181 - 201, with Service 201 deployment details carried forward to that new page. As such, I will be deleting the Service 201 - 220 deployment page very soon, which I think its unnecessary to implement.

Hope that you will appreciate your understanding on this matter. Thanks.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2014 (SGT)

Y With respect, I agreed with your decision. The creation of the deleted page did involved with some hesitation... SBS3107H (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2014 (SGT)

Editing pages under the history of bus services

When it comes to editing the pages under the history of bus services (pertaining to new bus services), you should follow the expected format as per below.

For example, Service 201.

Before the introduction:
This service will be re-introduced on 23rd November 2014, between Kent Ridge and Teban Gardens Rd (loop), under the LTA's Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP).

On the day of introduction:
Re-introduced on 23rd November 2014 as a service between Kent Ridge and Teban Gardens Rd (loop), under the LTA's Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP).

This also applies to the amendments of existing bus services.

For example, Service 189.

Before the amendments:
This service will be amended to loop at Clementi Ave 1, skipping West Coast Rd and Kent Ridge Ter, on 23rd November 2014.

On the day of amendments:
On 23rd November 2014, amended to loop at Clementi Ave 1, skipping West Coast Rd and Kent Ridge Ter.

I have already corrected the above sentences. Please do not use back the old format or to come up with other formats. The old format on the pages under the history of bus services is no longer in use anymore, hence, please use the new format, as it is implemented across every pages. Thank you.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2014 (SGT)

Y Apologise for anything. Thanks for the format. Also, I recommend you to make an sample format for future reference either at SgWiki:Guidelines or within the History of Bus Services itself. SBS3107H (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2014 (SGT)

Former deployments on fully retired buses

Good Afternoon SBS3107H,

I will be changing the format for those former deployments on fully retired buses to match the same table template for the SBS Transit and SMRT non-revenue buses page. This will be part of the standardisation table format for non-revenue buses.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 18:06, 15 December 2014 (SGT)

SBS Transit & SMRT Bus Deployments

Hi again SBS3107H,

I had decided to unlock these 2 pages (i.e. SBS Transit Bus Deployments and SMRT Bus Deployments), so that you will be able to update the list of registered buses without having to wait for the sgWiki administrators to edit the list.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 19:43, 17 December 2014 (SGT)