User talk:Scania
With regards to removal of buses on official lay up.
Hi,
I understand that there was such a rule, and I am discussing it with the others on this.
This is because it causes inconvenience later on when the buses come back into service. Hope you understand that, and I hope to get back to you when there is an outcome of the discussion.
--Scania 16:05, 13 August 2016 (SGT)
Greetings.
As far as I have been here, there is somewhat an established rule that buses that have already been offcially laid up (not just officially de-registered) tend to be removed from the list in the main deployments page, and their details would be shifted to the non-revenue buses page. That is why I still retained 5026D and 5031M on the page.
However, I acknowledged I haven't been here for some time, so whether such a rule had been changed over the past few months I am not entirely sure. Regardless of whether it is true, I would follow your instructions and let the content stay there as it be.
Cheers.
--ASA1234 (talk) 15:58, 13 August 2016 (SGT)
Just to add on, I did a comparison with the MAN deployment pages. The fact is that, SMB3520G, SMB5046X and SMB5082R are all officially laid up as of today in OM. So I would have to remove them from the deployment list as a result since it isn't a mere difference from SMB5026D and SMB5031M that is under unknown stage.
--ASA1234 (talk) 16:08, 13 August 2016 (SGT)
Reply from my talk page [1]
I believe you were referring to my edit removing Go-Ahead from the Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 3) page. I understand that Go-Ahead was said to receive the Batch 3 Wrights but it was not confirmed at that time and shouldn't be placed there, well, because it was not confirmed. Unless further useful information could be provided (there was only N/A in the Specifications table, N/A in the deployments section and N/A in Buses in depots section).