User talk:Supernutorcrazy

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

• Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
• Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
• Please do not ask for permission to do something.
• Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
• When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
  • Affected sections code
  • Advertisement in full
  • Affected parts to change in details.
  • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
• Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.

Re: Recent Edit

Hi.

• Reverting back of the trial of subpages for deployment service (eg. Clementi Feeders) which allows administrators to lock section of the page to prevent disruptive editing

I understand your intention of trialing this, as it is much easier for the admins to lock the sections instead of pages. However, it is quite troublesome for editors (including myself) to edit if someone have the intention to modify the subpages all in one go. Plus, I found out that it is difficult to trace back the edit histories for the respective sections as they are separated accordingly unlike in the past where they are all compiled together.

• Creating Templates (Template:Spec) for bus model information which only a single page can be used. (In violation of SgWiki:Guidbook Chapter 4 Paragraph 8).

I am currently creating these templates for the former buses specifications as there are some editors who have been amending the information for several former bus models. It is troublesome for me to edit them by their respective pages (those refurbished ones) as those locked ones are only accessible by the admins. I don't think it's fair for me to constantly transfer the recent edits without their heads up, hence the creation of these templates so as to synchronise the information with the refurbished pages as well as the former specs page. And yes I wasn't aware that I was violating the guidebook rules.

Thanks.

Proposal to Remove Selected Short-Trip Services at the Respective MRT Station Pages

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

I have noticed that certain Short-Trip Services such as 7A, 7B, 17A and 170A are labelled. However, I feel that it is better to standardise to remove them from the list. This is because other Short-Trip Services are not listed in the first place. Furthermore, they are not actually listed separately on the bus stop poles like supplementary "M" suffix variants do.

While I understand that have been previously categorised as Full Day Short-Trip Services, I feel they should still not be listed at these MRT Station pages as it is rather unusual considering the other Short-Trip Services are not listed at all.

Hope you understand. Thank you.

Themystery