Difference between revisions of "SgWiki:Renaming of Bus Models (Poll/Discussion)/1"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:


Other changes include:  
Other changes include:  
- SG2017C labelled as Euro VI Demonstrator, carrying identical chassis specifications to newer Euro VI units and hence lablled under "Euro VI Batch 1" instead.
- SG2017C labelled as Euro VI Demonstrator, carrying identical chassis specifications to newer Euro VI units and hence labeled under "Euro VI Batch 1" instead.


I hope this suggestion can open an dicsussion, within adminstrators as well as users to open up comments on presonal viewpoints, thanks.
I hope this suggestion can open an discussion, within administrators as well as users to open up comments on personal viewpoints, thanks.


--Litlah
--Litlah
Line 41: Line 41:


~ Themystery
~ Themystery
===Opinion 2===
It is completely unnecessary to rename them according to their emissions.
SG2017C is ordered under the same batch as SG5800M - SG5920A with a different set of internal specifications.
The bus should not be labelled as a Euro VI demonstrator since it carries the same bodywork as the later batch 3 units (SG5830B - SG5920A) with the same interior specifications.
~ SMB315C

Revision as of 23:12, 27 March 2020

Poll Result

SgWiki talk:Renaming of MAN ND323F (Poll/Discussion)

Starter Post

May I suggest labelling the A95 Batches by emissions, in a way like the K230UBs?

ie. Euro V Batch 1 (currently Batch 1): SMB5888H (Euro V Demonstrator); SMB5889E - SMB5904U

Euro V Batch 2 (currently Batch 2): SG5740C - SG5799J

Euro V Batch 3 (currently Batch 3): SG5800M - SG5920A

Euro VI Batch 1 (currently Batch 4): SG2017C (Euro VI Demonstrator) SG5921Y - SG6171M

Euro VI Batch 2 (currently Batch 5): SG6172K onwards

Such labelling allows to easily differentiate: - Specifications (SMRT for Euro V; LTA for Euro VI) - Euro VI buses being purchased in different orders from Euro V counterparts

Other changes include: - SG2017C labelled as Euro VI Demonstrator, carrying identical chassis specifications to newer Euro VI units and hence labeled under "Euro VI Batch 1" instead.

I hope this suggestion can open an discussion, within administrators as well as users to open up comments on personal viewpoints, thanks.

--Litlah

Your Opinion Below

Opinion 1

I support this change as it can be an opportunity to be standardised in a similar way as SBS Transit's Scania K230UBs, which are classified in the same manner.

The only doubt I have is about the classification of SG2017C as the Euro VI MAN ND323F demonstrator as it is not really considered a demonstrator. I am not sure what other people may think, but it sounds weird to classify that as a demonstrator. Nonetheless, I fully support this renaming exercise for the MAN ND323Fs.

~ Themystery

Opinion 2

It is completely unnecessary to rename them according to their emissions.

SG2017C is ordered under the same batch as SG5800M - SG5920A with a different set of internal specifications.

The bus should not be labelled as a Euro VI demonstrator since it carries the same bodywork as the later batch 3 units (SG5830B - SG5920A) with the same interior specifications.

~ SMB315C