Difference between revisions of "User talk:ASA1234"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:




Hi, I just seen with interest that you have updated the Service Guide List with 52(31 Oct 2013), 5, 48, 57(all three 23 March 2014) and 142 (27 Apr 2014). I will like you to show me the photos of these five service guides that I have mention.
== Do not remove rego ranges where it exists ==


Lastly, there is a facebook group of Service Guides Lovers where collectors will post photos of new guides whenever they are found. I am not so sure if you have join or not of this facebook group. If you have join you can post the photos there.
Hi ASA1234,


Thanks
It would be appreciated if you do not remove the rego ranges for the pages. These are there to provide a quick reference for the users, and also as a standardization across all companies.


Janang1982
--Scania 17:10, 3 September 2016 (SGT)


=======================
Saw your reply on my talk page, I still don't think that is a great idea as editors and users alike are already used to the rego ranges. Also, keep it separate from the company names as it will be untidy to put brackets in the company headings (the rego range sub-headings were there for this)


Reply to Janang1982:
--Scania 19:38, 3 September 2016 (SGT)


Greetings. Actually, I am 'Gus.chong' from Sgforums, and most of the true information are edited by me over the last two years. Previously I had borrowed a Facebook account by the name of 'Hexue Kerk’ which is the account you added into the group. However, some of the online friends of the original owner had been fed up and he informed me that I will have to stop using that account. Thereafter, I used another self-created account with a Chinese name  (which has since changed to an English name Wind Kerk) to send you a request message to add me into the group, and indicated my identity as stated in the first line, but you did not do anything despite indications that you had read that message. If you add that account into the group, it would be easier for me to show the pictures.
==Re: 4 years' lifespan extension for certain Volvo B10M Mark IIs?==
Hello.


I understand that there are misunderstandings because I placed the '138' in 31 July 2013 section of guides, in fact which is never existent at all. I would wish to clarify that that is a second-hand information I had gotten and nobody had corrected it before, thus resulting in the misunderstanding. But other than that, most other information I have edited are purely first-hand information.
Thank you for letting me know about this matter. I have unlocked the requested page ([[Volvo B10M Mark II]]). Do update me when done!
 
Cheers.

Latest revision as of 21:24, 29 July 2019

Please do not remove this talk page without my permission.[edit]

I would wish to clarify that nothing is to be removed from my personal talk page, including the page itself by others without my permission. It is a wrongdoing as such as shown on [1]. If anyone is shown doing such things again I will have to deal with it according to guidelines.

Thank you.


Do not remove rego ranges where it exists[edit]

Hi ASA1234,

It would be appreciated if you do not remove the rego ranges for the pages. These are there to provide a quick reference for the users, and also as a standardization across all companies.

--Scania 17:10, 3 September 2016 (SGT)

Saw your reply on my talk page, I still don't think that is a great idea as editors and users alike are already used to the rego ranges. Also, keep it separate from the company names as it will be untidy to put brackets in the company headings (the rego range sub-headings were there for this)

--Scania 19:38, 3 September 2016 (SGT)

Re: 4 years' lifespan extension for certain Volvo B10M Mark IIs?[edit]

Hello.

Thank you for letting me know about this matter. I have unlocked the requested page (Volvo B10M Mark II). Do update me when done!