Difference between revisions of "User talk:Apex-LW'21"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎User: SMB1368T: new section)
Line 31: Line 31:


-[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|Talk]]). 10 July 2015 11:58 SGT
-[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|Talk]]). 10 July 2015 11:58 SGT
Good Evening,<br>
For the new inactive accounts that are created in sgWiki, there's no way to tell that the account is created by a spambot or a legitimately created account.<br>
Hence, it is advisable for those legitimately created new account to begin editing in sgWiki (maybe put it in a 30 days timeframe from the date of creation), so long as the edits made follow the sgWiki Guidelines, since the spambot problem still exists.<br>
--[[User:Apex-LW&#39;21|Apex-LW&#39;21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW&#39;21|talk]]) 19:42, 10 July 2015 (SGT)

Revision as of 19:42, 10 July 2015

Welcome to my talk page!

Please post on my user talk page (not my user page) if you want me to delete any outdated / unrelated articles or any unused images existed in sgWiki. Also, please provide the links to the uploaded images (if any) when requesting to delete the articles.

I will review the pages first before I will delete, but however, should any of the pages that requires cleanup or is sufficiently related, it will not be deleted, unless there is a reason to believe that the article is the above-mentioned. Pages (including its talk page of a current page) which are blanked out, unanswered or remained for a certain prolonged period will be deleted in the event of any routine house-keeping or cleanup in sgWiki.

If your account is mistakenly banned due to posting of false or unrelated information, etc, please ask the administrator who had originally banned you by writing on the user's talk page to appeal, unless if you are mistakenly banned by me. If an information is mistakenly marked as false statement, you had to clarify with the administrator and provide justification that the information is true and accurate. However, the decision will be made by the administrator and the decision of the appeal is final, after the investigation is complete.

Do note that the successful appeal of the ban (only for those accounts banned by me) can only be done once. Once the ban appeal is successful, you are to comply with the sgWiki Guidelines. Appeals for repeated bans will not be considered.

The appeal procedures will also apply to the warning points imposed to the account.

If any articles or uploaded photos are deleted by mistake, please use my talk page to appeal. Please note that any deleted articles/photos will be subjected to further review and decision. This appeal only applies to articles/photos that were previously deleted by me. If you wish to appeal on any articles/photos that were previously existed in sgWiki that were deleted by any other administrators, please write on the respective talk pages.

Any accounts that are in severe violation of the sgWiki Guidelines will not be unbanned. Please ensure that all edits and articles are complied with the sgWiki Guidelines.

If your account is being affected by any Autoblock function caused by the user being blocked for spam advertising, etc, please use my talk page so that I can remove the Autoblock.

For any Captcha issues, please refer to the administrator 'Jason' by writing on his talk page.

For bus-related pages, if you find any mistakes in any pages (only those edited by me), please use my talk page to point out the mistakes and clarify with me. I will make the necessary corrections as soon as possible.


User: SMB1368T

Hi Apex-LW'21,

I highly suspected that the user: SMB1368T was a spambot as like the other spambot creation, no edit was immediately made after creating an account. The reason why I classify User 'SMB1368T' under spambot is because like other spambot, the user had not been editing for 12 hours. Let's continuing monitor his activities over the next few day. If so, I think now the 'spambot' had upgraded. I will post a talk page requesting him to make an edit in the next 7 days.

Thanks and Regards

-Supernutorcrazy (Talk). 10 July 2015 11:58 SGT

Good Evening,

For the new inactive accounts that are created in sgWiki, there's no way to tell that the account is created by a spambot or a legitimately created account.

Hence, it is advisable for those legitimately created new account to begin editing in sgWiki (maybe put it in a 30 days timeframe from the date of creation), so long as the edits made follow the sgWiki Guidelines, since the spambot problem still exists.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2015 (SGT)