Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lemon1974"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately
 
I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon
 
But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.
 
Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P
 
Jonathanchu
 
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.


Themystery
Thanks!


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


I’ve been seeing 6587K on 269 a lot lately. Took 1089B on 76 a few weeks ago, it was on 6587K’s slot 076-se-485. Any chance there has been a deployment swap between these two? If that’s the case though, that means 1089B should be seen on 668 too to confirm this change.
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


6574Y 1093M 1099Y running around a lot, 6004B always on 24
Themystery


Also, I haven’t really seen 5049R 5121P doing svc 70, they’re stated as svc 70 perms and there are 4 extra DDs for 70 on the webpage, should they be listed as SP instead?
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


Jonathanchu
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Latest revision as of 11:33, 31 May 2023

SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes[edit]

Hi Lemon1974,

Not sure about the morning crossover bus to 269 as of now, haven't seen 6810 around lately

I put 1025K as perm 269 as it always does the split shift with crossover to 262 in the afternoon

But one day this week I took 262 from amk int at about 8.10pm, was surprised to get SG1093M driven by 269 split shift bc (I did see 1093 on 269 with same bc that morning). Couldn't see DDU properly but it showed something like 269-se-4x2, definitely a crossover. I doubt it's the same one as 1025K as I saw the bus too on a different duty, and that slot should be se-413.

Really not sure how many 269/262 crossovers there are now. So many split shift duties seem to crossover. Not sure if this means 262 fleet reduction too? I haven't seen 1153 or 6580 around on 262 lately. The only full 262 split or E shift I see is 6594P

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742[edit]

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak[edit]

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad[edit]

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast