Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
Hey man,
Hey man,


I noticed that you had blocked user 'SBS3650E' for his edits made on 20 Feb night to the Service 37 page? And just wanted to clarify with you the reasons for the blockage.
I read your reply on my talk page. After reading the notice again + your reasons, I do agree with your reasons for taking out his edits (to prevent false info). But so, the main issue is with not stating his legitimate email by appealing while registering his account in time?
 
Is it for the table formatting (for the duties information) that he probably messed up alittle with the coding and such? Or for inputting SG5836K as perm replacing SBS9848M?
 
Because if he was blocked for inputting 5836K into Sv 37 (to replace 9848M), then i would feel that is alittle unfair? Since 5836K is indeed marked internally by BNDEP to sub 9848M for Sv 37 (which Apex did just edit in the end reflecting that same info as well)?
 
But if's regarding the table formatting that was messy, maybe you could elaborate on what needs to be done?
 
I have no other intentions, other than to clarify what's going on. Because i thought that blockage was abit weird.
 
But yeah, let me know of any updates, cheers.


Regards,
Regards,
SBS9631X
SBS9631X

Revision as of 10:16, 28 February 2018

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle

Just some clarifications on the Service 37 page

Hey man,

I read your reply on my talk page. After reading the notice again + your reasons, I do agree with your reasons for taking out his edits (to prevent false info). But so, the main issue is with not stating his legitimate email by appealing while registering his account in time?

Regards, SBS9631X