Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SimonLim88 (talk | contribs) (→SMRT AMDEP Services: new section) |
m |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you. | Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you. | ||
== AMDEP Rostering == | == AMDEP Rostering == | ||
Line 169: | Line 63: | ||
'''2) Relocate all Mandai allocated buses back to "AMDEP SP"''' | '''2) Relocate all Mandai allocated buses back to "AMDEP SP"''' | ||
'''3) Open a vote to all sgwiki admins / users to decide if Mandai deployments should be based on | '''3) Open a vote to all sgwiki admins / users to decide if Mandai deployments should be based on roster vs reality ( Like an election basically. )''' | ||
'''4) Have a discussion before deeming the bus as a permanent. (For example, SG5879L has been performing on 965 regularly but in the roster it is actually on 857. Keep the bus on hold until SG5879L has been observed appearing a certain amount of times on 965 and then verifying that it no longer appears on 857 on the following day.)''' | '''4) Have a discussion before deeming the bus as a permanent. (For example, SG5879L has been performing on 965 regularly but in the roster it is actually on 857. Keep the bus on hold until SG5879L has been observed appearing a certain amount of times on 965 and then verifying that it no longer appears on 857 on the following day.)''' | ||
'''5) Open another block to differentiate reality vs roster instead of creating a new page. A new notation can also be introduced to indicate a roster to reality basis. (Eg . SG5879L AMDEP 857///965) Or any other notations deemed fit.''' | |||
I do know that I have no right to make decisions but I feel that point 1 would cater to both the general public as well as the administrative roles. This is because in any case, if the general public is curious on what buses are actually shown on the roster, there is actually a reference for them to look into it and compare it with the actual deployments. While at this, may I also suggest regrouping the SMRT services into AMDEP / WLDEP / KJDEP. This is for easier reference for the public light and also much more easier for the general public to see the actual vs roster. I do hope you will consider my suggestions helpful and do feel free to add a topic into my discussion if you seek any clarifications. | I do know that I have no right to make decisions but I feel that point 1 would cater to both the general public as well as the administrative roles. This is because in any case, if the general public is curious on what buses are actually shown on the roster, there is actually a reference for them to look into it and compare it with the actual deployments. While at this, may I also suggest regrouping the SMRT services into AMDEP / WLDEP / KJDEP. This is for easier reference for the public light and also much more easier for the general public to see the actual vs roster. I do hope you will consider my suggestions helpful and do feel free to add a topic into my discussion if you seek any clarifications. | ||
Line 180: | Line 76: | ||
SimonLim88 | SimonLim88 | ||
--> | |||
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me. | |||
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback. | |||
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc. | |||
*Please do not ask for permission to do something. | |||
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared. | |||
*When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either | |||
**Affected sections code | |||
**Advertisement in full | |||
**Affected parts to change in details. | |||
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle''' | |||
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it. | |||
== Re: Recent Edit == | |||
Hi. | |||
* Reverting back of the trial of subpages for deployment service (eg. Clementi Feeders) which allows administrators to lock section of the page to prevent disruptive editing | |||
: I understand your intention of trialing this, as it is much easier for the admins to lock the sections instead of pages. However, it is quite troublesome for editors (including myself) to edit if someone have the intention to modify the subpages all in one go. Plus, I found out that it is difficult to trace back the edit histories for the respective sections as they are separated accordingly unlike in the past where they are all compiled together. | |||
*Creating Templates (Template:Spec) for bus model information which only a single page can be used. (In violation of SgWiki:Guidbook Chapter 4 Paragraph 8). | |||
: I am currently creating these templates for the former buses specifications as there are some editors who have been amending the information for several former bus models. It is troublesome for me to edit them by their respective pages (those refurbished ones) as those locked ones are only accessible by the admins. I don't think it's fair for me to constantly transfer the recent edits without their heads up, hence the creation of these templates so as to synchronise the information with the refurbished pages as well as the former specs page. And yes I wasn't aware that I was violating the guidebook rules. | |||
Thanks. | |||
== Update: Proposal to implement a new "History of City Direct Services" page == | |||
Hi Supernutorcrazy, | |||
You may ignore my proposal as I have found the existing History of City Direct Services page. I was previously unable to find it as the page was not categorised under "Buses" for some reason. I have since linked that page to the "Buses" category. | |||
For your notice. Thank you. | |||
Themystery |
Revision as of 16:40, 21 July 2020
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
- Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
- Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
- Please do not ask for permission to do something.
- Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
- When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
- Affected sections code
- Advertisement in full
- Affected parts to change in details.
- Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
- Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
Re: Recent Edit
Hi.
- Reverting back of the trial of subpages for deployment service (eg. Clementi Feeders) which allows administrators to lock section of the page to prevent disruptive editing
- I understand your intention of trialing this, as it is much easier for the admins to lock the sections instead of pages. However, it is quite troublesome for editors (including myself) to edit if someone have the intention to modify the subpages all in one go. Plus, I found out that it is difficult to trace back the edit histories for the respective sections as they are separated accordingly unlike in the past where they are all compiled together.
- Creating Templates (Template:Spec) for bus model information which only a single page can be used. (In violation of SgWiki:Guidbook Chapter 4 Paragraph 8).
- I am currently creating these templates for the former buses specifications as there are some editors who have been amending the information for several former bus models. It is troublesome for me to edit them by their respective pages (those refurbished ones) as those locked ones are only accessible by the admins. I don't think it's fair for me to constantly transfer the recent edits without their heads up, hence the creation of these templates so as to synchronise the information with the refurbished pages as well as the former specs page. And yes I wasn't aware that I was violating the guidebook rules.
Thanks.
Update: Proposal to implement a new "History of City Direct Services" page
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
You may ignore my proposal as I have found the existing History of City Direct Services page. I was previously unable to find it as the page was not categorised under "Buses" for some reason. I have since linked that page to the "Buses" category.
For your notice. Thank you.
Themystery