Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Remove Message requesting ban for false deployment (bus) <-- Please find alternative admins Thanks)
(289 intermediate revisions by 42 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


==Just some clarifications on the Service 37 page==
==Leave your message below==


Hey man,
===Rail Wiki Expansion===
 
I read your reply on my talk page. After reading the notice again + your reasons, I do agree with your reasons for taking out his edits (to prevent false info). But so, the main issue is with not stating his legitimate email by appealing while registering his account in time?
 
Regards,
SBS9631X
 
== Alternate Bus Service ==
 
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
 
I am writing this to ask whether I should include Niteowl & NightRider Service into the pages. As these services do not operate during normal train service hours, I think that we should not include them into the pages as it has little or no purpose
 
Regards, Thefoodie
 
== Kembagan MRT/bs 83059 clarification ==


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


I would like to clarify on the issue of bus stop 83059(Mjd Kassid), located along Changi Rd. Although it is a far distance away from Kembagan MRT Station, can this be marked as an exemption and be called as an MRT bus stop?  
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
 
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
Changi Rd(westbound) and Sims Ave East(eastbound) are one-way roads, in which it will not make sense to only specify the alternate bus services along Sims Ave East, and may put people into confusion in implying that there are no alternate westbound bus services. Furthermore, we put into consideration that Mjd Kassid bus stop is the calling point of MRT shuttle 7 towards Paya Lebar, and the bus stop having the Kembagan station name marked right below the stop name. Therefore, in my opinion, 83059 should be a MRT bus stop.
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
 
This issue came to my mind while I am doing a draft on Bedok Reservoir station alternate bus services in my user page.


If this can be possible, will you also mind looking into the following stop on Geylang Rd, on whether this should be an exemption and be considered an MRT bus stop?
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
City Plaza(82019) @Paya Lebar


I wish to clarify in case there may be possible false edits that I may not realise, thus writing this.
I apologize should I have anything that I have wrote inappropriately or by mistake/fault, and I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you.
== Google, Internet etc. search for train stations ==
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


Should there be an action taken to change in the station name pages to "MRT Station"/"LRT Station"? This is because when most people search for station names in eg. Google, the leading "MRT"/"LRT" wordings are always directly shown to them to choose the search results they want. Furthermore, the Sgwiki Train Staion pages are not on the first few pages of the search results of "XXX MRT", thus viewership for the Sgwiki train station pages may be low. Additionally, since the bus model pages of Sgwiki made it to their respective search results, I believe we can do the same thing to the train station pages, even though it may be time-consuming to change the page names and waiting for the train station pages to be on the first few search result pages.
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
Hi,


Thank you and I look forward to hear your perspective on this issue.
I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.  


Wekelwrady, 12.44pm, 5 Mar 2018
As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.


P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?
However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.


==TIBS & SMRT Buses Logo==
For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.
Good Morning Supernutorcrazy,<br>


I have uploaded the TIBS and SMRT Buses logo in sgwiki, and perhaps you might want to take a look at these logo for the existing TIBS and SMRT Buses logo template.<br>
I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.


[[File:SMRT Buses Logo New.png|200px]]<br>
Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!
New SMRT Buses logo in use since 2018.<br>


[[File:TIBS.png|200px]]<br>
===Wiki plans===
Actual TIBS logo which was in use from 1983 to 2004.<br>
On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.


There are two reasons for these logo to be uploaded.<br>
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


(1) For the TIBS logo, the TIBS logo (in Arial Black version) as appeared on the template and currently in use on various sgwiki pages, is a replica and unofficial version, which originally made its appearance only on the defunct TIBS website. But on those TIBS buses itself, including its printed material, uses the official TIBS logo.<br>
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


(2) SMRT had enhanced its logo again since 2018, and this is the closest logo which I can find on the SMRT website.<br>
== Concourse and exit layout WIP ==


Please advise if you have any further queries or otherwise, you can make the necessary changes for the existing template that contains the TIBS and SMRT Buses logo if you feel that if you're okay with the proposed changes.<br>
Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.


Thanks.<br>
Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.


--[[User:Apex-LW&#39;21|Apex-LW&#39;21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW&#39;21|talk]]) 08:55, 4 May 2018 (+08)
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Revision as of 16:07, 16 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

Hi,

I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.

As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.

However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.

For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.

I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.

Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!

Wiki plans

On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.

Reply: Fleet Size of 912

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Concourse and exit layout WIP

Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.

Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.

As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=609160"