Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Remove Message requesting ban for false deployment (bus) <-- Please find alternative admins Thanks)
(171 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--This section are reserved for unsolved case
== User SBS3107H ==
Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
== User SBS3107H ==
to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
rgds
lemon1974
== User Bus33333 & Tangabriel ==
Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you.
-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


Line 32: Line 12:
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.
==Leave your message below==


== Regarding my account  ==
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Hi Admin,
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


            I feel very puzzled as my account was being blocked when the IP address issue is not my fault. It will be Glad if you could unblock my account. Thank you.
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


Yours faithfully,
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


User SG5064X


== User:GoAheadAmbassador ==
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
Hi,
Hi,


I would like to flag out the disruptive edits done by the above mentioned user.
I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.  
 
1. Early this year, he claimed that the VSOs faced full retirement.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B10TL_(Volgren)&diff=prev&oldid=468236]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Former_Deployments&diff=prev&oldid=468237]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Short-Trip_Services&diff=prev&oldid=468238]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Tampines_Feeders&diff=prev&oldid=468241]
 
2. He uploaded an inappropriate file using the same file name as the current photo reflected on the [[Volvo B10TL (CDGE)]] page.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=File:SBS9889U_125.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=463067]
 
3. He requested to revert an edit on his behalf when he could have reverted it by himself.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424956]
 
4. He reminded 'SBS9631X' to block an editor when it is up to the administrators to decide.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424973]
 
5. He vandalised with nonsensical/unnecessary information on administrators talk page.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=429510]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464352&oldid=464303]
 
6. He requested the administrators to amend/update ad details based on his spotting/observations, when he could have done them by himself, or patiently waited for other editors to fill in the details.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433891]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433956]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434639]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434640]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=435566]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=448973]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450029]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450202]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=454912]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457070]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457287]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457686]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458382]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458603]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=459068]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=462681]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463300]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463624]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464092&oldid=463838]<br>
 
7. Asked a favour as if 'SBS9631X' owes him a living.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=436671]
 
Please do review the edits.
 
Thank you.
 
== Re: User:GoAheadAmbassador ==
 
Dear Admin
 
I am sorry that I will not do any disruptive editing ever again.<br>
Thank you.
 
Yours faithfully<br>
GoAheadAmbassador
 
==User:Go-Ahead Ambassasor==
 
Hi there,
 
With regards to you un-banning the following user, I guess we could agree to disagree. Because I banned him due to me receiving feedback from several other users, with regards to him adding in details that do not make not much of a difference to the overall listing.
 
Adding in a "Pte Ltd" word is more accurate rep perhaps to the company name, but to me (& many others), if that company name / extra details he edited doesn't appear anywhere at all on the ad (on the bus itself), his edits becomes inconsequential and pointless.
 
However, if his edits are on correcting the actual ad details (which are listed on the bus ad itself), then yes his edits would be a more accurate rep of the ad listing.
 
Hence, even though you and I have a different interpretation on this, nonetheless I will continue to monitor his edits and make sure he does not repeatedly edit pointless stuffs (after pointing out the rationale to him on my earlier ban to his account). He told me he will now edit more responsibly, so we shall KIV and see what happens.
 
Thanks & Regards,
SBS9631X
 
== Locked page for SMRT Services 700-883 ==
 
Hi I've been waiting to edit the updated rostering for the following Services 853 854 855 857 but with the page locked to only allow admins to edit how am I able to help edit to improve the accuracy based on rostering? Just because few kids who have been vandalizing the page? Now it's affecting me already. I got the updated duty numbers for those services which sgwiki has been outdated very badly and I was the one who have been updated those Mandai services. Thanks
 
~ Arthurjie
 
== AMDEP Rostering ==
 
There has been alot of conflicts of what was reflected in AMDEP's rostering v.s. what is deployed by the starter each day. The way 167 roster put all MAN buses but reality deploys so many more OCs, 980 full fleet OC + 1 Citaro in roster but in reality alot of MAN buses + minority OCs, 854 put OC500LE SD perms but in reality MAN A22/Citaro perms.
 
However it is also impossible to tell readers that AMDEP has many spare buses (like telling people AMDEP has 100-150+ spare buses in the past?!?!?!) because AMDEP practices rotational/random deployments unlike other depots out in KJ/WL/SBST depots. All my edits have followed based on the rostering, so by implementing that warning point it shows your admin team obviously doesn't know my current jobscope & industry I'm working in. Besides, your service pages has many outdated rostered duties both weekdays & especially wekeends, which some services could have received various timetable updates.
 
Oh you can also tell SimonLim88 if spotting the fleet is the way to deduce perms every single time, den I also wish how I'm able to figure out the actual deployed perms through how AMDEP deploys their buses.
 
It is also worth letting ya know 1709 1710 1711 1733 are reflected as 882, 981 perms in roster, which obviously I don't dare to edit knowing AMDEP deploys them on 171 way more frequently.
 
The question now is whether your team want to tell people what the roster reflects each buses are, or you want tell them how each buses are observed as which perm. After all, there should also be ways to explain how do the adverts from each buses come about & a rough gauge which service.
 
Thanks and no thanks to the warning point. I will defintiely appeal against this warning point and hope this can talk out to your team why I should not deserve that warning point. However if your team insists then I'll step out from all other accurate edits since more contribution = more warning point/editing ban. Thanks
 
~ Arthurjie
 
===Add on===
Hi. Apologies for the late response.
 
I feel that it would be appropriate to indicate these AMDEP buses similar to GA flexi-deployments. I wanted to implement this since the early days of this practice by AMDEP but I have been suggested to keep them as spare buses to keep them consistent with the other two depots KJDEP & WLDEP. This also caused AMDEP to accumulate many spare buses over the 3+ years.
 
I understand that you have been editing according to AMDEP's roster, which I have no objections regarding this as you have been trying to clear out the excess number of spare buses under AMDEP. Likewise, it could have better if the deployments are based on observations but minority of us have the spare time to spot the entire fleet of every single AMDEP services under a daily basis.
 
I will remove your warning point as it is clearly not 'false information' by tallying the scheduled deployments with the actual deployments.
 
Please do update me your thoughts regarding this matter.
 
Thanks.
 
== SMRT AMDEP Services ==


22 March 2020
As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.


Good evening Sir,
However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.


This matter is in regards to the recent conflicts that happened between me and Arthurjie about Mandai deployments. While I believe the admins should have made it clear on whether Mandai services rely on roster or actual deployments, I do personally feel that it was unfair to give Arthurjie a warning point because he was merely showing another side of the truth, which is the "roster". You can deem the roster as unreliable, but Arthurjie was not wrong to actually show what was in the roster. In fact, if there is anyone to blame, blame it on SMRT for having a roster but not following it. (Basically having a timetable in secondary school but lessons are on a random basis, which makes it completely unreliable.)
For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.


To prevent any future conflicts, I will go over a handful of solutions that I have thought of to help bring this matter to a close, so that both parties can reach a win win situation. Please do note that this list is non-exhaustive and can be added to suit better needs.  
I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.


'''1) Making a separate page for Mandai Services only, allocating the actual roster deployments apart from the deployments in reality.'''
Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!


'''2) Relocate all Mandai allocated buses back to "AMDEP SP"'''
===Wiki plans===
On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.


'''3) Open a vote to all sgwiki admins / users to decide if Mandai deployments should be based on AMDEP( Like an election basically. )'''
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


'''4) Have a discussion before deeming the bus as a permanent. (For example, SG5879L has been performing on 965 regularly but in the roster it is actually on 857. Keep the bus on hold until SG5879L has been observed appearing a certain amount of times on 965 and then verifying that it no longer appears on 857 on the following day.)'''
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


I do know that I have no right to make decisions but I feel that point 1 would cater to both the general public as well as the administrative roles. This is because in any case, if the general public is curious on what buses are actually shown on the roster, there is actually a reference for them to look into it and compare it with the actual deployments. While at this, may I also suggest regrouping the SMRT services into AMDEP / WLDEP / KJDEP. This is for easier reference for the public light and also much more easier for the general public to see the actual vs roster. I do hope you will consider my suggestions helpful and do feel free to add a topic into my discussion if you seek any clarifications.
== Concourse and exit layout WIP ==


Thank you for your patience, understanding and time into reading this.
Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.


Regards,
Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.


SimonLim88
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Revision as of 16:07, 16 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

Hi,

I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.

As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.

However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.

For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.

I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.

Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!

Wiki plans

On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.

Reply: Fleet Size of 912

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Concourse and exit layout WIP

Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.

Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.

As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=609160"