Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Remove Message requesting ban for false deployment (bus) <-- Please find alternative admins Thanks)
(101 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


==Leave your message below==
==Leave your message below==
== Re: Rail Bridging Services ==
 
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


I completely understand your doubts as Rail Bridging Services are something that most people do not get to experience on a regular basis. Hence, the routing and details are generally not widely disclosed. <br>
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


For the Downtown Line, I can reassure you that all DTL Rail Bridging Services will call at Dhoby Ghaut Stn for the purpose of ease of access to better alternative transport connectivity for commuters. This is the same for the 2nd time that the DTL Rail Bridging Service calls at Bugis Stn towards Expo as well. However, such information is normally not publicised at MRT Stations so I can understand the reason for your doubts.<br>
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


All MRT Lines have an official allocated operator for its respective Rail Bridging Service. However, with the recent amount of rail works involving the closure of the MRT Stations and operation of shuttle services which may not be operated by the official allocated operator in place of the MRT, other operators now have the ability to operate certain sectors of MRT lines that they do not officially operate on. For example, during the Kallang MRT accident on the EWL, Go-Ahead Singapore was the aloocated operator for that sector which operated accordingly as planned. However, there was 1 SMRT bus that was pulled over as well. This is because the SMRT Bus Captain that was pulled over was previously trained for the EWL Rail Bridging Service. Hence, while there is an official allocated operator, there is still the possibility of other operators roping in to offer their assistance.<br>


For the LRT, it is pretty self-explanatory so I will not go into that. For the CCL, it is fully operated by SMRT Buses. For the NEL and DTL, it is fully operated by SBS Transit. For the NSL, the regular bridging services are fully operated by SMRT Buses. However, its Ang Mo Kio - Serangoon special Crossline service is operated by SBS Transit. For the EWL, it is a little more of a special case and this is because SMRT has contracted out its Rail Bridging Services to other bus operators. Hence, I made the table to highlight the specific allocated operators for each sector accordingly for easy reference. What is more unique is that certain special Rail Bridging Services are co-operated by 2 bus operators.<br>
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
 
Hi,
I feel that assigning the official operator is still better as nobody is also for certain on which bus operator is trained for which Rail Bridging Service and may not add colours to the information alongside it.<br>


Hope all this information is helpful and answers your queries.
I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.  


Thank you.
As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.


Themystery
However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.


== Block ==
For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.


Hi,
I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.


May I ask why was I blocked just today after I edited to add the bus stop code for Boon Lay Stn?
Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!


Thanks and regards,
===Wiki plans===
On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.


AirFan19
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


== Enquiry from 'AirFan19': Bus rego usernames ==
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.
Hi.


The above mentioned user has wrote in to my talk page to request for an exemption for his friend who wants to join the sgWiki community using a bus registration number as the username.
== Concourse and exit layout WIP ==


'Hi SMB315C,
Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.


I have a friend who want to create an account for this wiki using a bus rego. However, since bus rego account names are banned here, he wants me to testify that he is not a disruptive editing user (per Supernutorcrazy's reply to SimonLim88 last time, https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SimonLim88&diff=next&oldid=493514). As such, can I ask, will exemption be granted if a known user on the wiki can testify that a newly created account on this wiki with a banned username is not a disruptive account/an account created solely for the disturbance of peace on this wiki?'
Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.


Update: Thanks for the clarification, I will contact my friend.
As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Revision as of 16:07, 16 April 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

Hi,

I think in the long run, it is still best to display the entire line as the degree of disruption may vary nonetheless.

As for an entire line breakdown, sections with parallel bus services make dispersal and waiting time less complicated.

However, it is rather strange that going between South & North, between East & West it's faster and easier to get alternatives due to the availability of TEL and NSL respectively (I am not sure how many FBBs Pasir Ris to Boon Lay one has to go for a whole line breakdown), while it's much harder and haywire finding alternatives for origin/destinations within the same area in the West and North sections.

For eg. due to the changes within Canberra town, the route to the next station Sembawang is only faster by FBB than by 117/M. Another example would be how travelling West from Tiong Bahru is only available via 33 and 122 which barely touches the next few stations westward.

I suggest that we can add footnotes for the above aforementioned stations that FBB is faster.

Would also like to request to delete the older revisions of File:W2T CityHall-Esplanade.png and File:JurongEast_LocalDirectory as I managed to figure out on editing and resolution sizing, thanks!

Wiki plans

On a side note, I welcome the changes to add tourism elements to the wiki. Prior to that I also had listed down getting pictures for public amenities in the Planning Areas page, when I have the free time, I will revamp again.

Reply: Fleet Size of 912

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Concourse and exit layout WIP

Bedok draft has been sketched from Photoshop, and I am on my way to collect more icons, and will make a visit to Admiralty probably next week to trial a similar layout.

Current elevator dimension is 160x160 on a side note.

As discussed before, I agree that there is indeed a need for a file sharing system, especially for icons. Thanks and Regards

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=609160"