Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Re "858 DD": new section)
 
(331 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


==Just some clarifications on the Service 37 page==
==Leave your message below==


Hey man,
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


I noticed that you had blocked user 'SBS3650E' for his edits made on 20 Feb night to the Service 37 page? And just wanted to clarify with you the reasons for the blockage.
Hi Supernutorcrazy,


Is it for the table formatting (for the duties information) that he probably messed up alittle with the coding and such? Or for inputting SG5836K as perm replacing SBS9848M?
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


Because if he was blocked for inputting 5836K into Sv 37 (to replace 9848M), then i would feel that is alittle unfair? Since 5836K is indeed marked internally by BNDEP to sub 9848M for Sv 37 (which Apex did just edit in the end reflecting that same info as well)?
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


But if's regarding the table formatting that was messy, maybe you could elaborate on what needs to be done?


I have no other intentions, other than to clarify what's going on. Because i thought that blockage was abit weird.
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


But yeah, let me know of any updates, cheers.
Hi,  


Regards,
I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.
SBS9631X
 
I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.
 
Thanks and Regards
 
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.
 
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.
 
== Re "858 DD" ==
 
I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.
 
AirFan19

Latest revision as of 20:21, 17 May 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Hi,

I have finished finalising the station map for Stadium. Would thus request to delete the older versions of the map.

I found a way to skirt through the resolution and make maps with 10 min circles. It may be difficult, but worth it depending on station.

Thanks and Regards

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Re "858 DD"[edit]

I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.

AirFan19