Difference between revisions of "User talk:TIB965Z"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
He/she should be reported for ban if he/she continues.
He/she should be reported for ban if he/she continues.


--[[User:SBS3602U|SBS3602U]] ([[User talk:SBS3602U|talk]]) 11:49, 25 June 2016 (SGT)
--[[User:SBS3602U|SBS3602U]] ([[User talk:SBS3602U|talk]]) 11:50, 25 June 2016 (SGT)

Revision as of 11:50, 25 June 2016

Re: About 828L and 829J

Hi TIB965Z.

Yes indeed, both buses have been laid up (aka awaiting de-registration) at their respective depots. However, there might be a possibility that SMRT is pasting the red logo on the exterior of both buses, like how I concluded back then where TIB904A was "laid up" as of 14 October 2015 but in the end SMRT pasted the red logos on the bus which was totally unexpected. I apologise for not being consistent in my editings, but I will temporarily edit both statuses as Spare Buses. If both buses are not going to be on revenue service in two weeks' time, I will then update both statuses as Awaiting De-registration.

Re:Editing enquiries

Hi TIB965Z,

Regarding to your quires about whether to list them in, I would strongly suggest so only if the BSEP buses had been on revenue service before like the non-BSEP buses. This is due to consistency work when editing after the "BSEP" rule for editing on sgWiki had been lifted.

Thanks & Regards

-Supernutorcrazy (Talk) 20 December 2015 23:12 (SGT)

Re: TT edits

I believe so too. Those are probably nonsensical edits. While I don't spot TT much myself, just judging from his/her editing patterns (every services have "spare buses", every services have no missing buses, etc.) is enough to tell you those are false edits. He/She has even edited service 183 that has not been handed over either... Bus models pages not updated with latest deployments. My edits were reverted by him today.

He/she should be reported for ban if he/she continues.

--SBS3602U (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2016 (SGT)