User talk:Svc135bsoe
Future Bus Services from Woodleigh Int[edit]
| Service | Destination |
|---|---|
| 81 | Tampines Int |
| 82 | Punggol Temp Int |
| 104 | Punggol Coast Int |
| 146 | Hougang St 21 / Kovan MRT (Loop) |
| 506 | Jurong East Int |
Future Bus Services from Punggol Coast Int[edit]
| Service | Destination |
|---|---|
| 34/e | Changi Airport (Loop) |
| 104 | Woodleigh Int |
| 117/M | Sembawang Int |
| 383 | Punggol Central / Punggol MRT (Loop) |
Predictions for Bus Services from Beauty World Int[edit]
| Service | Destination |
|---|---|
| 41 | Jurong East Int |
| 66 | Jurong East Int |
| 92 | Science Park Dr (Loop) |
| 100 | Serangoon Int |
| 111 | Temasek Ave (Loop) |
| 170 | Larkin Ter (Johor Bahru) |
| 871 | Tengah Int |
Predictions for Bus Services from Kallang Int[edit]
| Service | Destination |
|---|---|
| 11 | Rhu Cross (Loop) |
| 62 | Punggol Temp Int |
| 64 | Mei Ling St (Loop) |
| 134 | Marine Terrace (Loop) |
| 137 | Upp East Coast Ter |
| 140 | St Wilfred Road (Loop) |
| 141 | Toa Payoh Int |
| 175 | Clementi Int |
| 853 | Yishun Int |
| 961/M | Woodlands Temp Int |
| 980 | Sembawang Int |
| 985 | Choa Chu Kang Int |
Random Ideas and Stuff[edit]
| 135 | I've always liked Service 135 since it gets me from home to important places such as school. There's Woodleigh on the way and Marine Parade is not too far down. Aside from that, there's a full fleet of MB Citaros, which are personally my favourite bus model. That's my opinion, but what do you think? More information at Bus Service 135, created by me. |
|---|---|
| Seletar Bus Package | Seletar somehow gets all those lush greenies. LG Citaros, LG B9TLs, LG A22s... I feel that there are the least variety of batches and liveries in Seletar. But what do you think? |
| Buona Vista Bus Interchange | I always thought a bus interchange (whether ITH or normal) should be built at Buona Vista, which would merge and operate services from the existing Buona Vista Ter and perhaps some from Ghim Moh Ter. Another option would be one closer to Holland Village. But what do you think? |
Undo of your edits[edit]
Hi,
I had undo your edit on Bus Deployments by Service, as I do not want to be flamed by critics for implementing disorientation into this page for the following:
1. Trunk Service:
Now, it will be very confusing at a glance and reader will think that Service 135 and 138 had discontinued due to lack of continuous numbering. If we split it up like this:
Then it will be too long and weird. That was why there are quite a few service - despite having a separated pages, didn't have its listing indicated here but rather required a double click action.
2. Feeder service
This make it looks like there is two seperate town called "Choa Chu Kang". That is the reason why it will only be reflected when ALL pages is converted in it.
I hope you understand the rationale behind my undo.
Regards
RE: History Page for Defunct Services[edit]
Hi,
Sounds good. I was thinking what if we merged all (including those at respective bus pages) into the year page?
Regards
Supernutorcrazy
Opinion[edit]
Hi,
Thank you for sharing your feedback on the proposed changes earlier. I am pleased to inform you that the bus spotting page has been launched, which I believe will assist editors in verifying deployment accuracy and enhancing the reliability of current deployment information.
To address concerns regarding potential false entries on the spotting page, I trust in the integrity of our editors to avoid posting hypothetical or inaccurate information. Additionally, I have implemented features such as Date/Time stamps and Editor attribution to reinforce accountability.
Regarding the subpages, I have launched the following: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2). Deployment details have been transferred to the respective subpages.
As a trial, I finalised the layout for the first subpage: Scania K230UB (Euro IV) (Batch 2)/1, incorporating your valuable feedback.
Please confirm if the following criteria are met:
- Clear visibility and usability on mobile devices.
- Ease of information references.
If you have additional suggestions for improving the subpage layout, please do not hesitate to share your input. Thank you for your time and constructive feedback.
Regards, Supernutorcrazy
English Usage[edit]
Hi, saw your edits to help improve the language usage, but there is this part there is something that need to be adjusted:
- 41: It was the 34th bus service that benefits under the Land Transport Authority’s (LTA) Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP).
- 651: It was the 14th bus service that benefits under the Land Transport Authority’s (LTA) Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP), and the 1st peak-hour unidirectional city direct bus service introduced.
- 951E: It was the 12th bus service that benefits under the Land Transport Authority’s (LTA) Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP), and the 4th peak-hour unidirectional express bus service introduced.
- 230: It is the 16th bus service that benefited under the Land Transport Authority’s (LTA) Bus Connectivity Enhancement Programme (BCEP).
- 967: It was the 15th bus service that benefits under the Land Transport Authority’s (LTA) Bus Connectivity Enhancement Programme (BCEP).
Over here I used benefit(s/ed) instead of introduced or extended because - the count actually tally into it. For example, if we take 230 as an example, it is the 1st bus service that extended, because all the previous one is introduced, but on paper, they say it is the 16th bus service under BCEP.
If we look at bus service 41, it is not 34th bus service to be introduced, because the 34th didn't include - peak period bus services before it being introduced (9 of them), supplementary route, or operating hours extension. But on paper, it stated 34th bus service.
As for the term residential estates or residents, let's make it simpler - if it is road - use residents, if it is town name based on URA, then use residential estates.
- Residential estates - Town-centric, Building-centric
- Residents - People-centric
Using this method, I feel is clearer because a road can have industrial on one side, and residential on the other side, which means, residentials estates only means cater to one side of the road. But residents, we didn't say xxx's residents, so I guess it can inferred as Singapore residents (anyone) regardless of whether they live there or not.
I look forward to your suggestion on the term and structure.
Merging of Euro Emission & Batches[edit]
Hi,
Do you think we should merge the Euro Emission and Batches as we moves to subpage. This make it easier to link from Deployment by service pages back to model, and bus community will find it easier to find/track a bus rather than remembering the batches.
So it will be like this:
| Registration no. | Deployment | Batches (Optional Column) | Advertisement | Former Deployments |
|---|
Bodywork differences such as Volvo B9TL CDGE/WEG/Gemilang will not be affected, similiarily to 2D/3D variants.