Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS9631X"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
Hi,
Hi,


The main reason for 'SBS3650E' was failure to comply instructions. The revert edits are done in comply to the instructions to prevent vandalism/inserting false information.
Yes. According to the previous revision rule, all users should state his/her legitimate email prior to edit or face banned. When banned, the user are allowed to appeal with his/her legitimate email if the user has not edit/touch on any other pages.


The instructions is given at [//sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Template:Notice&oldid=409245 "Template:Notice"].
{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|28 Feb 2018|13:32}}
 
User 'SBS3650E' created his account on 20 Feb 2018, 21:20 which the rules had already applied.
 
The punishment given is therefore fair as stated. I also had implement it to countless page which is quite impossible to notice it.
 
{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|28 Feb 2018|00:59}}


==Service 7 fleet due to recent introduction of Service 7A & 7B==
==Service 7 fleet due to recent introduction of Service 7A & 7B==

Revision as of 13:32, 28 February 2018

Blockage Clarification

Hi,

Yes. According to the previous revision rule, all users should state his/her legitimate email prior to edit or face banned. When banned, the user are allowed to appeal with his/her legitimate email if the user has not edit/touch on any other pages.

Thanks & Regards

--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 28 Feb 2018 13:32 SGT

Service 7 fleet due to recent introduction of Service 7A & 7B

Reply

Hi SBS9631X,

Thanks for the reply pertaining to Service 7A and 7B.

But then, while the identification of the fleet of Service 7A and 7B is not a rush, the crossover details of Service 7A and 7B to Service 7, can be reflected in the bus deployments for Service 7 first, and a similar note on the crossover should also be reflected on the Service 7A and 7B on the SBS Transit Shortworking Trip Services page. Also, I would say that the fleet size would be about 7 to 8 buses (or maybe 9?), although the confirmed fleet size required KIV, given the frequency of Service 7A and 7B.

As for buses doing 7A and 7B perm status, I am proposing to reflect the perm status as BNDEP 7A/7* (for 7A) and BNDEP 7B/7* (for 7B), rather than the current input as BNDEP 7/7A* (for 7A) and BNDEP 7/7B* (for 7B).

If you have further clarifications, or comments you may need to add on, feel free to post on my talk page.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 10:52, 28 February 2018 (+08)