Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(373 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
*Please do not ask for general question like '''How to''' etc.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please do not ask for permission to do something.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
*Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
Line 9: Line 11:
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Affected parts to change in details.
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


==Just some clarifications on the Service 37 page==
==Leave your message below==


Hey man,
===Rail Wiki Expansion===


I read your reply on my talk page. After reading the notice again + your reasons, I do agree with your reasons for taking out his edits (to prevent false info). But so, the main issue is with not stating his legitimate email by appealing while registering his account in time?
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
 
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.
 
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.
 
 
==Station layout==
 
Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.
 
Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.
 
How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?
 
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==
 
Nah I checked the Main Page, I don't have the rights to edit.
 
Meanwhile I am getting some time to learn how to create a dropdown box
 
Thanks and Regards
 
==Service information ==
The Bus Stop Info can be kind of misleading because of the Show/Hide Route Details. Some readers may think that those are the only bus stops, it wld be btr to use the Click to Expand/Collapse function to prevent this.
 
Why not try Show/Hide Full Route Details at least now they know they are seeing only the details partially.
 
Bring back [[Bus Service 222/222A/222B]] and [[Bus Service 282]] will make the nesscary changes and if u can delete the redirects and move 222/A/B to 222.
 
Hi, how do we do the Green and White (G/W) Services, do they each get a separate page or a combined page
== Bus ads ==
 
Hi, regarding the new format in the pages, where are the ads? The advertisement column isn't there.
 
== Just to bring to your attention, the pages [[Former Deployments of BYD K9]] and [[Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)]] ==


Regards,
Just to bring to your attention that the pages [[Former Deployments of BYD K9]] and [[Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)]] are still around despite these models having been fully retired and all former deployments transferred to the main page.
SBS9631X


== Alternate Bus Service ==
== Bus Service Pages (History) ==


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
I think that including the history pre-integration might complicate things and confuse people. Better to remove them and put them in a separate bus service page, then link those pages I hope it confuses people less.


I am writing this to ask whether I should include Niteowl & NightRider Service into the pages. As these services do not operate during normal train service hours, I think that we should not include them into the pages as it has little or no purpose
== Since ==
Removed it because it contradicts with the operator and current deployment info. That specific time frames are clearly stated in the former deployment section. Will revert them if you are against this idea.


Regards, Thefoodie
== Re: Bus Ads ==


== Kembagan MRT/bs 83059 clarification ==
Hi maybe can put it out there any ad updates, can just put on my talk page, because I am interested in the latest bus ad updates. And I do have a personalised mobile bus deployments on my phone then can update there as well.


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
== White/blue UPD sticker ==


I would like to clarify on the issue of bus stop 83059(Mjd Kassid), located along Changi Rd. Although it is a far distance away from Kembagan MRT Station, can this be marked as an exemption and be called as an MRT bus stop?
Hi,  


Changi Rd(westbound) and Sims Ave East(eastbound) are one-way roads, in which it will not make sense to only specify the alternate bus services along Sims Ave East, and may put people into confusion in implying that there are no alternate westbound bus services. Furthermore, we put into consideration that Mjd Kassid bus stop is the calling point of MRT shuttle 7 towards Paya Lebar, and the bus stop having the Kembagan station name marked right below the stop name. Therefore, in my opinion, 83059 should be a MRT bus stop.
The white/blue UPD stickers differentiate UPDEP buses between those under tendered contract (white) and those not (blue). This is exspecially a problem for UPDEP spare fleet, and buses in depots like AMDEP, BNDEP meant for Bukit Merah package. Hope this helps.


This issue came to my mind while I am doing a draft on Bedok Reservoir station alternate bus services in my user page.
Regards,
Kay


If this can be possible, will you also mind looking into the following stop on Geylang Rd, on whether this should be an exemption and be considered an MRT bus stop?
== Re formatting of some svc fleet and all bus fleet pages ==
City Plaza(82019) @Paya Lebar


I wish to clarify in case there may be possible false edits that I may not realise, thus writing this.
Hi I’m just wondering why is all bus fleet pages alongside some svc fleet pages completely changed by someone who's “destroying” sgwiki completely & thinking it’s his own personal website and this makes it annoying for us editors to edit things right now I really hope u do revert most of the old format changes back as editors like me definitely do prefer it.


I apologize should I have anything that I have wrote inappropriately or by mistake/fault, and I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you.
== Re: reformatting of bus service pages ==


== Google, Internet etc. search for train stations ==
Hi, I see why you and sgbustrain may want to reformat it to make information more easily accessible by displaying information about each bus service all on 1 page. However, by reformatting these pages, they basically show information similar to what other websites and apps display. They will just be like landtransportguru’s bus service pages, but with much less information (i.e. route length, travelling time, and many photos of the bus service), rendering these SgWiki pages useless and replaceable. Even if you still insist on reformatting pages to have a page for each individual bus service, I hope that it will also include information like perm buses, down routes, duty table, etc. In conclusion, Sgwiki’s pages should offer something different and not just duplicate existing pages. Thanks.


Hi Supernutorcrazy,
Regards,
LTA Bus Irrationalisation


Should there be an action taken to change in the station name pages to "MRT Station"/"LRT Station"? This is because when most people search for station names in eg. Google, the leading "MRT"/"LRT" wordings are always directly shown to them to choose the search results they want. Furthermore, the Sgwiki Train Staion pages are not on the first few pages of the search results of "XXX MRT", thus viewership for the Sgwiki train station pages may be low. Additionally, since the bus model pages of Sgwiki made it to their respective search results, I believe we can do the same thing to the train station pages, even though it may be time-consuming to change the page names and waiting for the train station pages to be on the first few search result pages.
== Deletion of those 2 pages or leave it like that ==


Thank you and I look forward to hear your perspective on this issue.
Since those services in those 2 pages are transferred to it's own service page respectively, why I can see to refer it. I have two choices as to delete since it's already transferred or leave it like that? Here are the two pages


Wekelwrady, 12.44pm, 5 Mar 2018
*[[Bedok Feeder Services 222 - 229]]
*[[Toa Payoh Feeder Services 230 - 238]]


P.S.Since users are working on the 3.0 project, won't high viewership from people be important?
Thanks


==Logo==
[[User:Alphabetlorefan1|Alphabetlorefan1]] ([[User talk:Alphabetlorefan1|talk]]) 5 November 2024, 12:11
Good Morning Supernutorcrazy,<br>


I have uploaded the TIBS and SMRT Buses logo in sgwiki, and perhaps you might want to take a look at these logo as a replacement for the template.<br>
== Bus History page ==


[[File:SMRT Buses Logo New.png]]<br>
Hi is it possible that History page be kept untouched? I nearly missed out on Sv 78's amendment to Jurong Town Hall Int when doing a complication of the bus history for today (26 November)
New SMRT Buses logo in use since 2018.<br>


[[File:TIBS.png]]
== Loss of Bus Advertisement Information ==
Actual TIBS logo which was in use from 1983 to 2004.<br>


There are two reasons for these logo to be uploaded.<br>
Hi there,


(1) For the TIBS logo, the TIBS logo (in Arial Black version) as appeared on the template and in use widely, is a replica and unofficial version, which only made its appearance on the defunct TIBS website. But those buses itself, including its printed material, uses the official TIBS logo.<br>
It has been very long since I last spoke to you. A little mixed feelings with regards to the changes but nevertheless would wish to highlight on the removal of the bus advertisement section on bus deployments by model. This makes it harder for bus enthusiasts to track on new bus advertisements and I feel it is a real shame that all the hard work that has been done by previous editors have been put to waste.


(2) SMRT had enhanced its logo since 2018, and this is the closest logo which I can find on the SMRT website.<br>
Also, in addition to that, I feel the new organisation of information is making the rows and columns unnecessarily long and I do not think this is a good thing from a user perspective point of view (eg. The labeling for Lush Green livery across ~100 buses in rego number succession cannot even be seen easily because so many buses have this livery).


Please advise or make the necessary changes for the existing template that contains the TIBS and SMRT Buses logo.<br>
With these changes, I also wish to know if Bus Deployments by Service and Bus Deployments by Model will be '''completely''' independent and separate from each other. Because from the way I see it, editors are no longer able to update bus deployments for specific rego numbers into the new Bus Deployments by Service pages. Maybe it would be good if I could get some clarity on the overall changes and the basis for these drastic changes.


Thanks.<br>
Thank you.


--[[User:Apex-LW&#39;21|Apex-LW&#39;21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW&#39;21|talk]]) 08:55, 4 May 2018 (+08)
Themystery

Latest revision as of 02:38, 30 November 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Station layout[edit]

Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.

Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.

How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?

Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

Nah I checked the Main Page, I don't have the rights to edit.

Meanwhile I am getting some time to learn how to create a dropdown box

Thanks and Regards

Service information[edit]

The Bus Stop Info can be kind of misleading because of the Show/Hide Route Details. Some readers may think that those are the only bus stops, it wld be btr to use the Click to Expand/Collapse function to prevent this.

Why not try Show/Hide Full Route Details at least now they know they are seeing only the details partially.

Bring back Bus Service 222/222A/222B and Bus Service 282 will make the nesscary changes and if u can delete the redirects and move 222/A/B to 222.

Hi, how do we do the Green and White (G/W) Services, do they each get a separate page or a combined page

Bus ads[edit]

Hi, regarding the new format in the pages, where are the ads? The advertisement column isn't there.

Just to bring to your attention, the pages Former Deployments of BYD K9 and Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE)[edit]

Just to bring to your attention that the pages Former Deployments of BYD K9 and Former Deployments of Volvo B9TL (CDGE) are still around despite these models having been fully retired and all former deployments transferred to the main page.

Bus Service Pages (History)[edit]

I think that including the history pre-integration might complicate things and confuse people. Better to remove them and put them in a separate bus service page, then link those pages I hope it confuses people less.

Since[edit]

Removed it because it contradicts with the operator and current deployment info. That specific time frames are clearly stated in the former deployment section. Will revert them if you are against this idea.

Re: Bus Ads[edit]

Hi maybe can put it out there any ad updates, can just put on my talk page, because I am interested in the latest bus ad updates. And I do have a personalised mobile bus deployments on my phone then can update there as well.

White/blue UPD sticker[edit]

Hi,

The white/blue UPD stickers differentiate UPDEP buses between those under tendered contract (white) and those not (blue). This is exspecially a problem for UPDEP spare fleet, and buses in depots like AMDEP, BNDEP meant for Bukit Merah package. Hope this helps.

Regards, Kay

Re formatting of some svc fleet and all bus fleet pages[edit]

Hi I’m just wondering why is all bus fleet pages alongside some svc fleet pages completely changed by someone who's “destroying” sgwiki completely & thinking it’s his own personal website and this makes it annoying for us editors to edit things right now I really hope u do revert most of the old format changes back as editors like me definitely do prefer it.

Re: reformatting of bus service pages[edit]

Hi, I see why you and sgbustrain may want to reformat it to make information more easily accessible by displaying information about each bus service all on 1 page. However, by reformatting these pages, they basically show information similar to what other websites and apps display. They will just be like landtransportguru’s bus service pages, but with much less information (i.e. route length, travelling time, and many photos of the bus service), rendering these SgWiki pages useless and replaceable. Even if you still insist on reformatting pages to have a page for each individual bus service, I hope that it will also include information like perm buses, down routes, duty table, etc. In conclusion, Sgwiki’s pages should offer something different and not just duplicate existing pages. Thanks.

Regards, LTA Bus Irrationalisation

Deletion of those 2 pages or leave it like that[edit]

Since those services in those 2 pages are transferred to it's own service page respectively, why I can see to refer it. I have two choices as to delete since it's already transferred or leave it like that? Here are the two pages

Thanks

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 5 November 2024, 12:11

Bus History page[edit]

Hi is it possible that History page be kept untouched? I nearly missed out on Sv 78's amendment to Jurong Town Hall Int when doing a complication of the bus history for today (26 November)

Loss of Bus Advertisement Information[edit]

Hi there,

It has been very long since I last spoke to you. A little mixed feelings with regards to the changes but nevertheless would wish to highlight on the removal of the bus advertisement section on bus deployments by model. This makes it harder for bus enthusiasts to track on new bus advertisements and I feel it is a real shame that all the hard work that has been done by previous editors have been put to waste.

Also, in addition to that, I feel the new organisation of information is making the rows and columns unnecessarily long and I do not think this is a good thing from a user perspective point of view (eg. The labeling for Lush Green livery across ~100 buses in rego number succession cannot even be seen easily because so many buses have this livery).

With these changes, I also wish to know if Bus Deployments by Service and Bus Deployments by Model will be completely independent and separate from each other. Because from the way I see it, editors are no longer able to update bus deployments for specific rego numbers into the new Bus Deployments by Service pages. Maybe it would be good if I could get some clarity on the overall changes and the basis for these drastic changes.

Thank you.

Themystery

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Supernutorcrazy&oldid=639435"