User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Themystery (talk | contribs)
6,438 edits
→Recent edits: new section
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,681 edits
 
(115 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Regarding Your Ad Changes Edits==
== SG1085L ==
Dear Mr Lemon,


We admins have our own daily jobs to do as well, and we know you do too. What we can do, is try to update the ad details + deployment details as often & up-to-date as possible.
Hi Lemon1974,


Regarding the SDIC edits previously, yes I did make them, but I'm just keeping the Wiki updated accordingly. The person who edits does not always equate to the same person who sees it, do bear that in mind.
Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.


If you happen to find ad details that are missing / incorrect, no one's stopping you from editing them accordingly, as long as you denote accordingly in the Summary section as well.
One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.


So I (on behalf of the other Sgwiki admins) would appreciate if you do your part, and we admins will do our part as well to keep Wiki as up-to-date as possible.
27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.


If you've got any other issues, feel free to raise them as and when you see them.
29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.


Thanks for your co-operation.
6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261


-SBS9631X
Jonathanchu


==Re: Trabis==
==User: Bus74742==
Thanks for the heads up.
Hi.


==Re:==
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.
Thanks for your countless valuable inputs. As this issue is between users, it would be appropriate for me to hear the viewpoint on both party to decide the next course of action.


If there is anymore clarification, I will contact you again.
Thanks!


Thanks and regards
== 268B for Evening Peak ==


{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|20 March 2019|20:49}}
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


==Re:new strides /bus plus bus==
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.
Hello.


Have created the page on your behalf. PC7991M is currently registered under BYD SG (201409518W).
Themystery


== SEDEP bus edits ==
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


Hi Lemon1974
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast


It would be sincerely appreciated if you can edit the relevant Former Deployments pages when you edit deployment changes as well. Otherwise, this can cause confusion next time when readers see it. Thank you.
== Bus allocation ==


Themystery
Hi,


== Recent edits ==
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.


Hi Lemon1974,
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.


Thank you for your help in editing the SBS Transit Spare Buses page. I tend to always forget to edit this page for some reason. So sorry about that and thank you.
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.  


Themystery
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:58, 29 April 2026

SG1085L

Hi Lemon1974,

Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.

One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.

27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.

29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.

6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=728119"