Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supernutorcrazy"

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(194 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--C851E : 2018 6 NEL 11 CCL 2019 12 CCL-->
<!--This section are reserved for unsolved case
== User SBS3107H ==
Hi could you remove SBS3107H as admin? I feel he doesn't deserve the admin role from the way he reverts edit for no rhyme or reason,and editing it back himself, before he starts blocking users
== User SBS3107H ==
to add on the above feedback regarding SBS3107H, i have actually make the same feedback earlier to APEX-LW21 last week. many incorrect edit by this user and also, recently he undo CORRECT edit for new registration for B5LH page and lock the page and reedit himself with the same information. why? is that B5lH section reserve entirely for him?
EDIT: ADD ON 20/3, just discover that he is doing the same for MAN A95/MAN A22 BATCH 4 PAGE. other person edits new registration (under Go-ahead) and he undo all the edit of these registrations? and he edit it back himself? so being a moderator is allowed to do this?
rgds
lemon1974
== User Bus33333 & Tangabriel ==
Hi, both of them have been doing disruptive editing to "quarrel" and both of them used a mod notice ok each other's userpage. Could you look into this? Thank you.
-->
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.
Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.


Line 32: Line 12:
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
**Avoid statement like '''same as other vehicle'''
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
*I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.


== Regarding my account  ==
==Leave your message below==
 
Hi Admin,
 
            I feel very puzzled as my account was being blocked when the IP address issue is not my fault. It will be Glad if you could unblock my account. Thank you.
 
Yours faithfully,
 
User SG5064X
 
== User:GoAheadAmbassador ==
Hi,
 
I would like to flag out the disruptive edits done by the above mentioned user.
 
1. Early this year, he claimed that the VSOs faced full retirement.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Volvo_B10TL_(Volgren)&diff=prev&oldid=468236]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Former_Deployments&diff=prev&oldid=468237]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=SBS_Transit_Short-Trip_Services&diff=prev&oldid=468238]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=Tampines_Feeders&diff=prev&oldid=468241]
 
2. He uploaded an inappropriate file using the same file name as the current photo reflected on the [[Volvo B10TL (CDGE)]] page.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=File:SBS9889U_125.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=463067]
 
3. He requested to revert an edit on his behalf when he could have reverted it by himself.
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424956]
 
4. He reminded 'SBS9631X' to block an editor when it is up to the administrators to decide.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=424973]
 
5. He vandalised with nonsensical/unnecessary information on administrators talk page.<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=429510]
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464352&oldid=464303]


6. He requested the administrators to amend/update ad details based on his spotting/observations, when he could have done them by himself, or patiently waited for other editors to fill in the details.<br>
===Rail Wiki Expansion===
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433891]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=433956]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434639]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=434640]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=435566]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=448973]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450029]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=450202]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=454912]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457070]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457287]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=457686]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458382]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=458603]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=459068]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=462681]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463300]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=463624]<br>
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASMB315C&type=revision&diff=464092&oldid=463838]<br>


7. Asked a favour as if 'SBS9631X' owes him a living.<br>
Hi Supernutorcrazy,
* [https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SBS9631X&diff=prev&oldid=436671]


Please do review the edits.
Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?<br>
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit<br>
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.


Thank you.
I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


== Re: User:GoAheadAmbassador ==


Dear Admin
==Station layout==


I am sorry that I will not do any disruptive editing ever again.<br>
Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.
Thank you.


Yours faithfully<br>
Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.
GoAheadAmbassador


==User:Go-Ahead Ambassasor==
How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?


Hi there,
== Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades==


With regards to you un-banning the following user, I guess we could agree to disagree. Because I banned him due to me receiving feedback from several other users, with regards to him adding in details that do not make not much of a difference to the overall listing.
In the meantime, once the TEL4 updates are done, I will be doing massive work on the locality maps after figuring out everything with the Bayfront map as the new standard that I finished up on. 1 month tearing down drafts, revisiting the colour palletes, redoing everything from scratch feels so worth it after delivering a promising result.  


Adding in a "Pte Ltd" word is more accurate rep perhaps to the company name, but to me (& many others), if that company name / extra details he edited doesn't appear anywhere at all on the ad (on the bus itself), his edits becomes inconsequential and pointless.
A question that still sticks to my mind is the definition of walking distance by the authorities. When I looked at each sample map and measured the distance to the boundary of the 10 min circle, they defined  it as 450m-600m, with 500m being the most common out of most new locality maps.


However, if his edits are on correcting the actual ad details (which are listed on the bus ad itself), then yes his edits would be a more accurate rep of the ad listing.
Do we still proceed with our definition of 1 min=80m for walking?


Hence, even though you and I have a different interpretation on this, nonetheless I will continue to monitor his edits and make sure he does not repeatedly edit pointless stuffs (after pointing out the rationale to him on my earlier ban to his account). He told me he will now edit more responsibly, so we shall KIV and see what happens.
Thanks and Regards


Thanks & Regards,
=== Reply on Walking ===
SBS9631X


== Locked page for SMRT Services 700-883 ==
Noted explanation. We will proceed with 1minute = 80 metres. I have also discovered that besides Google Maps, you can also use the ruler function of OneMap to help map out the easiest walking paths.


Hi I've been waiting to edit the updated rostering for the following Services 853 854 855 857 but with the page locked to only allow admins to edit how am I able to help edit to improve the accuracy based on rostering? Just because few kids who have been vandalizing the page? Now it's affecting me already. I got the updated duty numbers for those services which sgwiki has been outdated very badly and I was the one who have been updated those Mandai services. Thanks
I am thinking of a concept of walking such that it can be in this format


~ Arthurjie
Total: xxx m <br>
1. Walk <br>
2. Turn <br>
3. Keep walking <br>


== AMDEP Rostering ==
If the walking instructions are too much, especially between stations, then we can continue putting the most common walking paths the form of W2T diagrams. However, where necessary, might resort to put the station locality map in the walking instructions since the nearby stations are reflected OR when barrier free access requirements are not fulfilled. Barrier free access is still needed, as per your reminder 2 years ago. Raffles Place diagram was only half useful.


There has been alot of conflicts of what was reflected in AMDEP's rostering v.s. what is deployed by the starter each day. The way 167 roster put all MAN buses but reality deploys so many more OCs, 980 full fleet OC + 1 Citaro in roster but in reality alot of MAN buses + minority OCs, 854 put OC500LE SD perms but in reality MAN A22/Citaro perms.  
Irregardless of the choice we make, I will continue to make custom W2T/walking instruction maps, especially for Shenton Way's and Tanjong Rhu's part, which in turn can do away lengthy sentences into short phrases.


However it is also impossible to tell readers that AMDEP has many spare buses (like telling people AMDEP has 100-150+ spare buses in the past?!?!?!) because AMDEP practices rotational/random deployments unlike other depots out in KJ/WL/SBST depots. All my edits have followed based on the rostering, so by implementing that warning point it shows your admin team obviously doesn't know my current jobscope & industry I'm working in. Besides, your service pages has many outdated rostered duties both weekdays & especially wekeends, which some services could have received various timetable updates.  
Edit: Just as I was about to write a complaint on the unavailability of the Bugis - Jalan Besar walking map, I keyed in the station codes and they actually put it up recently without me saying a word. But their diagram passes through closed off areas on NSC construction...


Oh you can also tell SimonLim88 if spotting the fleet is the way to deduce perms every single time, den I also wish how I'm able to figure out the actual deployed perms through how AMDEP deploys their buses.  
== Reply: Fleet Size of 912 ==
Hi.


It is also worth letting ya know 1709 1710 1711 1733 are reflected as 882, 981 perms in roster, which obviously I don't dare to edit knowing AMDEP deploys them on 171 way more frequently.
I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.


The question now is whether your team want to tell people what the roster reflects each buses are, or you want tell them how each buses are observed as which perm. After all, there should also be ways to explain how do the adverts from each buses come about & a rough gauge which service.
== Re "858 DD" ==


Thanks and no thanks to the warning point. I will defintiely appeal against this warning point and hope this can talk out to your team why I should not deserve that warning point. However if your team insists then I'll step out from all other accurate edits since more contribution = more warning point/editing ban. Thanks
I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.


~ Arthurjie
AirFan19

Latest revision as of 00:53, 13 June 2024

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

  • Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
  • Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
  • Please do not ask for permission to do something.
  • Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
  • When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
    • Affected sections code
    • Advertisement in full
    • Affected parts to change in details.
    • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
  • Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
  • I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Leave your message below[edit]

Rail Wiki Expansion[edit]

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.


Station layout[edit]

Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.

Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.

How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?

Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades[edit]

In the meantime, once the TEL4 updates are done, I will be doing massive work on the locality maps after figuring out everything with the Bayfront map as the new standard that I finished up on. 1 month tearing down drafts, revisiting the colour palletes, redoing everything from scratch feels so worth it after delivering a promising result.

A question that still sticks to my mind is the definition of walking distance by the authorities. When I looked at each sample map and measured the distance to the boundary of the 10 min circle, they defined it as 450m-600m, with 500m being the most common out of most new locality maps.

Do we still proceed with our definition of 1 min=80m for walking?

Thanks and Regards

Reply on Walking[edit]

Noted explanation. We will proceed with 1minute = 80 metres. I have also discovered that besides Google Maps, you can also use the ruler function of OneMap to help map out the easiest walking paths.

I am thinking of a concept of walking such that it can be in this format

Total: xxx m
1. Walk
2. Turn
3. Keep walking

If the walking instructions are too much, especially between stations, then we can continue putting the most common walking paths the form of W2T diagrams. However, where necessary, might resort to put the station locality map in the walking instructions since the nearby stations are reflected OR when barrier free access requirements are not fulfilled. Barrier free access is still needed, as per your reminder 2 years ago. Raffles Place diagram was only half useful.

Irregardless of the choice we make, I will continue to make custom W2T/walking instruction maps, especially for Shenton Way's and Tanjong Rhu's part, which in turn can do away lengthy sentences into short phrases.

Edit: Just as I was about to write a complaint on the unavailability of the Bugis - Jalan Besar walking map, I keyed in the station codes and they actually put it up recently without me saying a word. But their diagram passes through closed off areas on NSC construction...

Reply: Fleet Size of 912[edit]

Hi.

I will leave the fleet size as 4 for now. As far as I know they only have 4 buses scheduled with 5 AP duties every day.

Re "858 DD"[edit]

I thank you for the message. Just to put it on record, I have no issues with the revert, which I find completely justified (as you've laid out on the false impression part), and I would've removed/changed the message as well. However, the message that Alphabetlorefan1 said "bus 858 DDs are cameo" was an erroneous one, as they are not cameos, which you've also recognized that there are downroute slots. Hence I felt there was a need to correct the user so as to prevent any misunderstandings in the future.

AirFan19