User talk:Lemon1974: Difference between revisions

From SgWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
No edit summary
Jonathanchu (talk | contribs)
2,681 edits
 
(103 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Re: Peak & Off-Peak Dilemma ==
== SG1085L ==


Hi Lemon1974,
Hi Lemon1974,


I think forwarding your concerns to the administrators would be a better option. I am not an administrator that can decide and determine the changes.
Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.


Hope this helps. Thank you.
One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.


Themystery
27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.
 
29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.
 
6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261
 
Jonathanchu
 
==User: Bus74742==
Hi.
 
Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.
 
Thanks!
 
== 268B for Evening Peak ==
 
Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,


== SEDEP Citaro Deployment Changes ==
Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.


Hi Lemon1974,
Themystery


I would just like to notify you about some possible deployment changes and maybe you can help keep a look out.
== Grab Unlimited Ad ==


SBS2002H 162 >> 138 (on 138 daily for the past weeks)<br>
The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast
SBS6827T 162 >> 138/SP (on 138 quite often as well and sometimes other AMK Int services)<br>
SG1172T 162 >> 24 (seen on 24 on an AP duty very often as well)<br>
SG1162Y SP >> 265 (seen on 265 split shifts often)<br>
SBS6064C 138 >> 268 (seen on 268 quite a few times, and E6 A22s on 6064C’s 138 perm duty)<br>
SBS6582Z/SBS6578L/SBS6889P/SBS6589E >> 265 (these buses keep appearing on duty 4A 11P, not sure if there’s a specific pattern or it’s just random deployments)


Sorry for disturbing but just notifying you and hopefully more changes can be identified and confirmed. Thank you!
== Bus allocation ==


Jonathanchu
Hi,


== Re: off peak/peak ==
Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.  
Hi.


It will be best if we can input the timings for the short-trips & down-routes.
But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.  


I guess we should follow the timings for OPP. However these peak hour timings should also apply for weekends & PHs instead of indicating them as off-peak for the entire day.
The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.  


Thanks.
Hope it clarifies.

Latest revision as of 20:58, 29 April 2026

SG1085L

Hi Lemon1974,

Yes, I actually do see it on 162 in the evening most of the time. I'll try to keep a lookout for it in the morning.

One thing is that it doesn't have the internal 261 sign that all the other perms have. But I've also spotted SBS5010P with the internal 261 sign so might be worth keeping an eye on it too.

27/4 update: 1085L indeed was on 261 this morning and currently (in the evening) on 162. Didn't get to board it so can't see what the block number / original service is.

29/4 update: 1085L seems to be 162 PM shift. Not sure what time it starts 162 but as of now it should be on 162 PM shift.

6068S yes I see frequently on 261, with 261 internal desto. 6168L about a month back I remember seeing on 261 with internal desto too, but as of now from what I recall seems to be doing 24 more than 261

Jonathanchu

User: Bus74742

Hi.

Thanks for highlighting this. Yes this particular user created the account today. I have imposed a warning point for this user for now. Will take the necessary actions when needed if the user continues to add false information.

Thanks!

268B for Evening Peak

Hi to both Lemon1974 and Jonathanchu,

Just letting you know that 268B is still detected on the bus apps. 1843 hours departing the first bus stop. Should be only 1 trip for evening now I believe. Thanks and regards.

Themystery

Grab Unlimited Ad

The removal of Grab Unlimited was not a mistake, but "this same ad made a return onto the same rego aft becoming adless due to some issues from Grab", quote from another bus enthusiast

Bus allocation

Hi,

Just saw the comment you left on the BYD page. The buses you mentioned can appear because they are operator based, meaning the buses can be cross deployed on different depots and services.

But the BYD buses are a different thing. These are specifically allocated to package, which in this case, it’s Sengkang Hougang. Nothing to do with depot, which is also the reason why when SKDEP opens, the BYD buses will follow to SKDEP, since HGDEP will be purely based on Serangoon Eunos.

The two scenarios are completely different, one being package based and the other being operator based.

Hope it clarifies.

Retrieved from "https://sgwiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemon1974&oldid=728119"