Difference between revisions of "User talk:TIB965Z"
m |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers. | :Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers. | ||
==RE:Editing of deployment of services== | |||
Hi, | |||
To clarify the doubt, with effect from 1 September 2016, '''SMRT Bus Deployments from Depot''' and '''SBS Transit Bus Deployments from Depot''' had been replaced by '''Bus Deployments by Package'''. I had intentionally left the existing pages for a period of time in case users felt the need to use this information back instead of '''Bus Deployments by Package'''. | |||
As such, it is not compulsory to update the outdated pages anymore. | |||
For more information of the changes, you may refer to [[User talk:Apex-LW'21|Apex-LW'21's talk page]]. | |||
Thanks & Regards | |||
--[[User:Supernutorcrazy|Supernutorcrazy]] ([[User talk:Supernutorcrazy|talk]]) 09:14 6 September 2016 (SGT) |
Revision as of 09:14, 6 September 2016
Re: About 828L and 829J
Hi TIB965Z.
Yes indeed, both buses have been laid up (aka awaiting de-registration) at their respective depots. However, there might be a possibility that SMRT is pasting the red logo on the exterior of both buses, like how I concluded back then where TIB904A was "laid up" as of 14 October 2015 but in the end SMRT pasted the red logos on the bus which was totally unexpected. I apologise for not being consistent in my editings, but I will temporarily edit both statuses as Spare Buses. If both buses are not going to be on revenue service in two weeks' time, I will then update both statuses as Awaiting De-registration.
Re:Editing enquiries
Hi TIB965Z,
Regarding to your quires about whether to list them in, I would strongly suggest so only if the BSEP buses had been on revenue service before like the non-BSEP buses. This is due to consistency work when editing after the "BSEP" rule for editing on sgWiki had been lifted.
Thanks & Regards
-Supernutorcrazy (Talk) 20 December 2015 23:12 (SGT)
Re: TT edits
I believe so too. Those are probably nonsensical edits. While I don't spot TT much myself, just judging from his/her editing patterns (every services have "spare buses", every services have no missing buses, etc.) is enough to tell you those are false edits. He/She has even edited service 183 that has not been handed over either... My edits were reverted by him today.
He/she should be reported for ban if he/she continues.
--SBS3602U (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2016 (SGT)
- Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers.
RE:Editing of deployment of services
Hi,
To clarify the doubt, with effect from 1 September 2016, SMRT Bus Deployments from Depot and SBS Transit Bus Deployments from Depot had been replaced by Bus Deployments by Package. I had intentionally left the existing pages for a period of time in case users felt the need to use this information back instead of Bus Deployments by Package.
As such, it is not compulsory to update the outdated pages anymore.
For more information of the changes, you may refer to Apex-LW'21's talk page.
Thanks & Regards
--Supernutorcrazy (talk) 09:14 6 September 2016 (SGT)