User talk:SBS3602U

May 2016

Is samtlk's information on SgForums accurate? You also revert my edit? SBS3107H^talk 19:36, 29 May 2016 (SGT)

√ Replied

His information are with effect from 29 May 2016 or today. So yeah, I think you need to check the quantity of buses. SBS3107H^talk 21:43, 29 May 2016 (SGT)

..

Hi.

Do you know anything about SMB1367X? Someone said it got involved in an accident and being laid out, but I am not sure about this.

SMB1368T

√ Replied

SMB388S

Hi! SBS3602U I'm johnlyh77, I believe you believe SMB388S have the same power/torque with the production patch, i take both models bus before on highway at PIE to BKE. SMB388S could only reach 30km/h, production batch can reach 45kn/h. You ask the bus captain, they will say SMB388S no pick-up, production batch is much better. The original post is believed have wrong information. You may try find other website to got information. Thanksgiving, johnlyh77

√ Replied

TT edits

Good morning,

I believe Jason Lam's edits on the TT deployments by service pages are all fake. I believe 189 actually have some perm B9TLs. Same goes for 66. What do you think? --TIB965Z (talk) 10:29, 25 June 2016 (SGT)

√ Replied

Hi. I personally work under Tower Transit and merely adding in correct information as of 20/06/2016. Please refrain from criticizing my edits. Cheers.

Noted. Thanks --TIB965Z (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2016 (SGT)

Parks Service 408 withdrawal

Good Evening,

I think the info of the upcoming Parks Service 408 withdrawal should still be reflected on the History of Parks Services page, as SBS Transit had officially announced that the service would be withdrawn on 1st August 2016 according to the press release.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2016 (SGT)

add link

Hi! SBS3602U I had a few friends and i often visit SMRT and SBS Transit (SgWiki), when press the link is link to Deployments and we have to scroll up to see the Specifications. This is not very practical. Most people outside perfer to see Specifications than Deployments, to understand different between each brand of buses. About the ( http://sgwiki.com/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_O530_Citaro )could add a Specifications would be better so that don't need to scroll down.

Example: If you open the SMRT Bus Deployments, and you see (SG5040P – SG5052E, SG5061D – SG5068K) is allowed to be press. When you want to see the Specifications, you need to scroll all the way up to see the specifications. Is very very far! Hope for your understanding.

Sincerely, Johnlyh77

√ Replied

SBS 6334Z

Hi! SBS3602U

There is something wrong at Mercedes-Benz O530 Citaro (Batch 1), is this bus with SBS transit or Go Ahead? Under deployment is still SBS but under Specification is put under Go Ahead?

Under total quality should we put total production batch or different companies total? Now the total quality is put into under different companies.

Sincerely, Johnlyh77

√ Replied

CITARO O530

Hi! SBS3602U

There is 2 type of Model in (SBS) Mercedes-Benz O530 Citaro (Batch 2). I checked this bus: SBS6444P is CITARO O530 6.4L AT TURBO ABS. Should we divide them?

--Johnlyh77 (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2016 (SGT)

√ Replied

Volvo B9TL (Wright Eclipse Gemini 2) (Batch 1)

Hi! SBS 3602U

1. This website: (http://www.sgbuses.com/v/sbst/b9tl-wright/) said that Batch 1 is using 'ZF EcoLife 6AP 1403B Gearbox' not ZF EcoLife 6 AP 1410 B. I don't know which is correct? ZF EcoLife 6 AP 1410 B is replaced by ZF EcoLife 6AP 1403B am i right?
2. About land transport guru (Batch 3): http://landtransportguru.net/volvo-b9tl/. I had make a comment about the Gearbox. But nobody reply, later they deleted my comment. Should we inform them about it? Thanks

--Johnlyh77 (talk) 16:31, 1 August 2016 (SGT)

With regards to removal of buses on official lay up.

Greetings.

As far as I have been here, there is somewhat an established rule that buses that have already been offcially laid up (not just officially de-registered) tend to be removed from the list in the main deployments page, and their details would be shifted to the non-revenue buses page. That is why I still retained 5026D and 5031M on the page.

However, I acknowledged I haven't been here for some time, so whether such a rule had been changed over the past few months I am not entirely sure. Regardless of whether it is true, I would follow your instructions and let the content stay there as it be.

Cheers.

--ASA1234 (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2016 (SGT)

Just to add on, I did a comparison with the MAN deployment pages. The fact is that, SMB3520G, SMB5046X and SMB5082R are all officially laid up as of today in OM. So I would have to remove them from the deployment list as a result since it isn't a mere difference from SMB5026D and SMB5031M that is under unknown status.

--ASA1234 (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2016 (SGT)