Difference between revisions of "User talk:SBS9631X"
Apex-LW'21 (talk | contribs) |
Apex-LW'21 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Service 7 fleet due to recent introduction of Service 7A & 7B== | ==Service 7 fleet due to recent introduction of Service 7A & 7B== | ||
===Reply=== | |||
Hi SBS9631X,<br> | Hi SBS9631X,<br> | ||
Thanks for the reply pertaining to Service 7A and 7B. | |||
But then, while the identification of the fleet of Service 7A and 7B is not a rush, the crossover details of Service 7A and 7B to Service 7, can be reflected in the bus deployments for Service 7 first, and a similar note on the crossover should also be reflected on the Service 7A and 7B on the SBS Transit Shortworking Trip Services page. Also, I would say that the fleet size would be about 7 to 8 buses (or maybe 9?), although the confirmed fleet size required KIV, given the frequency of Service 7A and 7B. | |||
As for buses doing 7A and 7B perm status, I am proposing to reflect the perm status as BNDEP 7A/7* (for 7A) and BNDEP 7B/7* (for 7B), rather than the current input as BNDEP 7/7A* (for 7A) and BNDEP 7/7B* (for 7B). | |||
--[[User:Apex-LW'21|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21|talk]]) 10:52, 28 February 2018 (+08) | |||
--[[User:Apex-LW'21|Apex-LW'21]] ([[User talk:Apex-LW'21|talk]]) |
Revision as of 10:52, 28 February 2018
Blockage Clarification
Hi,
The main reason for 'SBS3650E' was failure to comply instructions. The revert edits are done in comply to the instructions to prevent vandalism/inserting false information.
The instructions is given at "Template:Notice".
User 'SBS3650E' created his account on 20 Feb 2018, 21:20 which the rules had already applied.
The punishment given is therefore fair as stated. I also had implement it to countless page which is quite impossible to notice it.
Thanks & Regards
--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 28 Feb 2018 00:59 SGT
Service 7 fleet due to recent introduction of Service 7A & 7B
Reply
Hi SBS9631X,
Thanks for the reply pertaining to Service 7A and 7B.
But then, while the identification of the fleet of Service 7A and 7B is not a rush, the crossover details of Service 7A and 7B to Service 7, can be reflected in the bus deployments for Service 7 first, and a similar note on the crossover should also be reflected on the Service 7A and 7B on the SBS Transit Shortworking Trip Services page. Also, I would say that the fleet size would be about 7 to 8 buses (or maybe 9?), although the confirmed fleet size required KIV, given the frequency of Service 7A and 7B.
As for buses doing 7A and 7B perm status, I am proposing to reflect the perm status as BNDEP 7A/7* (for 7A) and BNDEP 7B/7* (for 7B), rather than the current input as BNDEP 7/7A* (for 7A) and BNDEP 7/7B* (for 7B).
--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 10:52, 28 February 2018 (+08)