User talk:SBS3602U
| Welcome to my talk page. |
|---|
| Feel free to clarify anything regarding my edits here. 👍 |
| + Create a new topic |
Changing of Bus Image
Hi,
I would like to highlight to you, as I had done to user Apex-LW'21, that the images posted by the new users does not required image attribution etc. if they are taken by themselves and upload, in acknowledge that sgWiki had CC (Creative Common - Fair Use). However, with the images we used to upload in the past belongs to other community groups, if they had contact us for usage of their image, we, as an administrator, are obliged to delete the images as describe by them due to copyright reasons.
I hope that this clear the misconception of images need to have "image attribution". But of course, proper naming of images is required as per normal and proper credits should be given if using of other users images.
Regards
Thanks & Regards
--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 19 Mar 2017 1921 SGT
Seeking clarification as to SMB5046X actual status.
I am filing this application seeking a clarification with regards to the legitimate/appropriate status to be listed for SMB5046X in both the Alexander Dennis Enviro500 and SMRT Non-Revenue Buses pages. Recently, it has been reported by several bus enthusiasts in Facebook that SMB5046X had been repaired and back on service with the following differences as reflected on the former page:
a) The red SMRT logos are now gapless. b) The bus is back with a new 'IMOB' advertisement. c) The bus is now from AMDEP, and is currently listed as AMDEP SP in the Enviro 500 age.
However, official checks revealed that SMB5046X is still under official lay up till 11 August 2017 as reflected in the One Motoring website. While the bus deployment pages may not have been congruous with the non-revenue buses (e.g. some of the buses as unknown statuses in the latter do not have a 'N/A' status in the former in the case of those not officially laid up), some of those bus enthusiasts failed to realise that SMB5046X had actually been officially laid up previously and is, as of now, still officially laid up.
I have checked on past similar cases and the closest one is about to 3 Wrights and 4 Citaros being reflected as laid up from the period between 19 August 2011 and 23 February 2012, while in fact during this period when reflected as laid up, they have been spotted doing BNDEP services and there was no lay up status reflected in their deployment pages. Similarly, SMB5046X cannot be said to be a non-revenue bus (since it had been reported to have been on service recently), but since the system of reflecting deployments have been reviewed and is therefore different from that of 2011, I would therefore refer this matter for your advice as well as that of the administrators.
Cheers.