BYD BC12A04: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

4 January 2025

1 January 2025

29 December 2024

23 December 2024

10 December 2024

  • curprev 20:4120:41, 10 December 2024 Haram talk contribs 4,707 bytes −1 And if you guys don’t agree with me, please give constructive criticism and not just undoing my edits without any reason or valid argument. I try to give as much information from both LTA and operator sides and if you guys don’t agree, just come to my talk page and tell me about it. Oh and Lemon1974, SG5999Z is another example of a package allocated bus. It can only be deployed on 7 strictly because of how LTA sets out the rules. Tag: Undo
  • curprev 20:3720:37, 10 December 2024 Haram talk contribs 4,708 bytes +1 What you’re comparing are 2 different scenarios. The UPDEP scenario is different to this, as those buses are operator allocated. What the BYD buses are facing now is package allocation, which is fully based on Sengkang Hougang. Package allocated buses CANNOT be deployed to other services unless approval from LTA is given. The buses you’re referring to are operator allocated, so SBST can anyhow deploy. Its like you’re comparing an apple to an orange and saying both are the same cuz they’re fruits
  • curprev 20:0420:04, 10 December 2024 Lemon1974 talk contribs 4,707 bytes −10 to add on, if based on haram's logic, then those UPD buses in AMDEP, should be listed as UPDEP instead of AMDEP since they belong to UPDEP. and some of these buses charges during day time. dont think all 10 units charge overnight.
  • curprev 17:4417:44, 10 December 2024 Gabrielcheong talk contribs 4,717 bytes +31 Specifications
  • curprev 17:2517:25, 10 December 2024 Gabrielcheong talk contribs 4,686 bytes +6 Notes
  • curprev 01:5401:54, 10 December 2024 23ispolo talk contribs m 4,680 bytes +110 To be clear, I have read Haram's descriptions and rationales for classifying SG3102H to SG3104C as HGDEP (which are understandable). However, I respectably disagree with this classification, and think that as the buses are technically under AMDEP now, it is better for them to be stated as AMDEP 86 for the time being (until they move to HGDEP or SKDEP). That said, I have left a note below to indicate their leasing to AMDEP (from HGDEP). Thank you!

8 December 2024

7 December 2024

3 December 2024

2 December 2024

30 November 2024

28 November 2024

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)