Difference between revisions of "User talk:SG5064X"
m |
(→OC deployment: new section) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|27 June 2017|16:49}} | {{AdminMsg|Supernutorcrazy|27 June 2017|16:49}} | ||
== OC deployment == | |||
Hi, | |||
I believe that 107L should be more sticky to 975 now that it has the nursing advert. Meanwhile for 104U, it keeps jumping around, or operates during peak hours only hence it's not seen.. hope this will help | |||
--[[User:TIB965Z|TIB965Z]] ([[User talk:TIB965Z|talk]]) 18:44, 19 June 2018 (+08) |
Revision as of 18:44, 19 June 2018
TIB1206A
Hi,
I am user SG5119Y.I am a SG forum user but my SG forum name is not SG5119Y.Regarding on your edit,I can understand how both u and other user feels.TIB1206A is now perm.I also text that user already.Cheers.Thanks.
RE: Suspected Multiple accounts hold by TIB1152X 190
Hi SG5064X,
Thank you for whistle blowing the two accounts for suspected multiple account holders. I had been observing the two accounts that you had provided over the days. As the editing patterns are different from one another, there is no concrete link to be hold by the same users.
Regarding on the clause on editing false information/disruptive editing, I would sincerely apologies as my main duty in-charge (as admin) is under the RAIL sector and not buses. You may wished to inform another admin @ Apex-LW'21 or any of the long-time editors to backed your claim before I could do any preventive measures.
Thanks & Regards
Thanks & Regards
--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 27 June 2017 16:49 SGT
OC deployment
Hi,
I believe that 107L should be more sticky to 975 now that it has the nursing advert. Meanwhile for 104U, it keeps jumping around, or operates during peak hours only hence it's not seen.. hope this will help --TIB965Z (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2018 (+08)