User talk:Jason

Revision delete (RevDel) feature

Good Morning Jason,

Can you include a revision delete feature for sgWiki? The revision delete feature is commonly used on Wikipedia, where administrators can delete or hide a certain edit by Wikipedia users.

This revision delete feature is used to hide offensive, disruptive or spammy edits, where administrators will respond to using revision delete feature once it is detected on sight.

--Apex-LW'21 (talk) 09:31, 20 February 2017 (SGT)

Log Information/Maintenance Report Bugs

Hi Jason,

I would like to bring out that the report page of what links here has a bug. Certain special page stated that missing files is required as the page include the missing files. However, I had found out that no page link to that particular missing files.

Alternative, can you clear/delete the logs/cache that had been deleted for more than 2 years or so.

Thanks & Regards

--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 7 September 2017 22:24 SGT

Revoke of Admin Rights

Hi Jason,

Can you kindly revoke the admin rights to User:118 alex as his behavior does not seems to fit nicely to the admins image and cause other admins image to be lower.

• Abuse of administrative rights which was later revert within a few minutes.
• Revert edits and then added it back on his own accord within a few minutes.

Thanks & Regards

--Supernutorcrazy (talk, administrator) 19 January 2018 22:12 SGT

Application to be an administrator for SgWiki

Greetings.

I am making this application to be appointed as an administrator of SgWiki, as there are a number of pages which are only editable by administrators, such as Volvo B10M Mark IV (DM), Volvo B10M Mark IV (Walter Alexander Strider), Volvo Olympian 3-Axle (Batch 1) and etc, need to include additional information (such as distinctions between buses that had received lifespan extensions before retirement) in accordance with existing format used for previous retired bus model pages such as Volvo B10M Mark II.

I acknowledged that given what had transpired earlier today (i.e. the abuse of admin powers on the part of a user to eliminate all other admins), the criteria for assessing the suitability of administrators would be reviewed in a stricter fashion. I would swear an affirmation that during all these years I have contributed to the editing in SgWiki, I have always acted in a non-partisan manner and the best interests of the bus community. I do not get into heated arguments or disagreements with other users without foundation or basis.

In reliance on the grounds I have set out above, I would pray for this application to be granted.

Thank you.

--ASA1234 (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2018 (+08)