User talk:Supernutorcrazy

Rules for my feedback to stop irritate me.

• Please kindly wait for up to 7 days unless stated otherwise for my reply to your feedback. No reply will be given if your feedback does not require reply or I could not answer to your feedback.
• Please do not ask for general question like How to etc.
• Please do not ask for permission to do something.
• Please refrain from requesting to retrieved deleted article as excessive history will be cleared.
• When requesting me to edit locked pages, please give either
  • Affected sections code
  • Advertisement in full
  • Affected parts to change in details.
  • Avoid statement like same as other vehicle
• Please kindly indicate Autoblock ID if you have been affected from it.
• I will not entertain any request under BCM transition.

Staggered Bus Stop for Bus Service Pages

Bus Stop	Service	Bus Stop	Service
10017 Aft Hosp Dr(Front Berth) Eu Tong Sen St	61 124 143 147 166 197 961 961M	10017 Aft Hosp Dr(Rear Berth) Eu Tong Sen St	2 12 12e 54 122 167 174 174e 190 196
45139 Kranji Stn(Berth 1) W'lands Rd	160 170 178 960 961 961M	45139 Kranji Stn(Berth 2) W'lands Rd	170X 925 925M
46101 W'lands Checkpt(SG Buses Berth) W'lands Crossing	160 170 170X 950
46109 W'lands Checkpt(SG Buses Berth) W'lands Crossing	160 170 170X 950
46211 Johor Bahru Checkpt(Berth 11 & 12) Johor Bahru	160 170
46219 Johor Bahru Checkpt(Platform A, SBS Transit Berth) Johor Bahru	160 170 170X	46219 Johor Bahru Checkpt(Platform B, SMRT Buses Berth) Johor Bahru	950
51071 MacRitchie Resvr(Inner Berth) Thomson Rd	93 156 157	51071 MacRitchie Resvr(Outer Berth) Thomson Rd	52 74 130 132 165 166 167 852 855 980
65191 Bef Punggol Rd(Berth 1a) TPE	3 34 109 110 118 168 858 969	65191 Bef Punggol Rd(Berth 1b) TPE	27 88 89 89e
65199 Aft Punggol Rd(Berth 1a) TPE	27 34 110 118 168 858 969	65199 Aft Punggol Rd(Berth 1b) TPE	3 88 89 89e 109
92041 Marine Pde Stn Exit 2(Front Berth) Marine Parade Rd	15 36 135 966	92041 Marine Pde Stn Exit 2(Rear Berth) Marine Parade Rd	31 43 43e 48 134 196 196e 197 853M
95029 Changi Airport Ter 1(Berth 1) PTB1 Basement	36	95029 Changi Airport Ter 1(Berth 2) PTB1 Basement	53 110 858
95029 Changi Airport Ter 1(Berth 3) PTB1 Basement	24 27 34
95109 Changi Airport Ter 3(Berth 1) PTB3 Basement	36	95109 Changi Airport Ter 3(Berth 2) PTB3 Basement	53 110 858
95109 Changi Airport Ter 3(Berth 3) PTB3 Basement	24 27 34
95129 Changi Airport Ter 2(Berth 1) PTB2 Basement	36	95129 Changi Airport Ter 2(Berth 2) PTB2 Basement	53
95129 Changi Airport Ter 2(Berth 3) PTB2 Basement	110 858	95129 Changi Airport Ter 2(Berth 4) PTB2 Basement	27
95129 Changi Airport Ter 2(Berth 5) PTB2 Basement	34	95129 Changi Airport Ter 2(Berth 6) PTB2 Basement	24
95209 Changi Airport Ter 4(Berth 1) T4 Cres	36 110	95209 Changi Airport Ter 4(Berth 2) T4 Cres	24 34

Leave your message below

Rail Wiki Expansion

Hi Supernutorcrazy,

Is it OK to add info of train deployments (including TRNs and their sequences), acronyms legend and train fleet info (similar to what's done for buses)?
Data can be obtained from here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PMuCeF31etWzPv_U42qMaFoHvYwDpnkSWHgjvuuTxdg/edit
All data collated in the above document are based on spottings and observations from fellow enthusiasts.

I hope you will support us to make these valuable information more accessible to all. Thank you.

Station layout

Looks like a perfect concept! Very simple and straight to the point with just the icons in place.

Was this inspired from the elevator diagrams that appear at certain stations eg. Somerset, Chinatown? I will try and see whether I have the skill to do a replication.

How would this turn out if it were a transfer station?

Map progress /Alternative Travel Method Upgrades

Nah I checked the Main Page, I don't have the rights to edit.

Meanwhile I am getting some time to learn how to create a dropdown box

Thanks and Regards

White/blue UPD sticker

Hi,

The white/blue UPD stickers differentiate UPDEP buses between those under tendered contract (white) and those not (blue). This is exspecially a problem for UPDEP spare fleet, and buses in depots like AMDEP, BNDEP meant for Bukit Merah package. Hope this helps.

Regards, Kay

Re formatting of some svc fleet and all bus fleet pages

Hi I’m just wondering why is all bus fleet pages alongside some svc fleet pages completely changed by someone who's “destroying” sgwiki completely & thinking it’s his own personal website and this makes it annoying for us editors to edit things right now I really hope u do revert most of the old format changes back as editors like me definitely do prefer it.

Re: reformatting of bus service pages

Hi, I see why you and sgbustrain may want to reformat it to make information more easily accessible by displaying information about each bus service all on 1 page. However, by reformatting these pages, they basically show information similar to what other websites and apps display. They will just be like landtransportguru’s bus service pages, but with much less information (i.e. route length, travelling time, and many photos of the bus service), rendering these SgWiki pages useless and replaceable. Even if you still insist on reformatting pages to have a page for each individual bus service, I hope that it will also include information like perm buses, down routes, duty table, etc. In conclusion, Sgwiki’s pages should offer something different and not just duplicate existing pages. Thanks.

Regards, LTA Bus Irrationalisation

Bus History page

Hi is it possible that History page be kept untouched? I nearly missed out on Sv 78's amendment to Jurong Town Hall Int when doing a complication of the bus history for today (26 November)

Loss of Bus Advertisement Information

Hi there,

It has been very long since I last spoke to you. A little mixed feelings with regards to the changes but nevertheless would wish to highlight on the removal of the bus advertisement section on bus deployments by model. This makes it harder for bus enthusiasts to track on new bus advertisements and I feel it is a real shame that all the hard work that has been done by previous editors have been put to waste.

Also, in addition to that, I feel the new organisation of information is making the rows and columns unnecessarily long and I do not think this is a good thing from a user perspective point of view (eg. The labeling for Lush Green livery across ~100 buses in rego number succession cannot even be seen easily because so many buses have this livery).

With these changes, I also wish to know if Bus Deployments by Service and Bus Deployments by Model will be completely independent and separate from each other. Because from the way I see it, editors are no longer able to update bus deployments for specific rego numbers into the new Bus Deployments by Service pages. Maybe it would be good if I could get some clarity on the overall changes and the basis for these drastic changes.

Thank you.

Themystery

Re: Clickable Link (Bus Service)

Yup I think it is much better now. Thanks.

~LTA Bus Irrationalisation

Depot Allocation

Hi,

First of all, you need to understand that AMDEP is a support depot, similar to BRBP, where it is not assigned to any package. Initially, 86 was meant to be under Sengkang-Hougang and based off HGDEP, but due to severe overloading and HGDEP is shared between 2 packages, Serangoon-Eunos and Sengkang-Hougang.

This is also why SBST is able to practice dual depot measures, because they have a support depot to reduce overcrowding of buses in other depots. These methods are not approved by the LTA and are considered illegal and a breach of the tender.

Anyways back to your question, for SMRT and TTS, those buses are operator allocated, hence, cross depot cameos are frequent (Eg. E500s on 961 and 960 etc). This is not the case for the BYDs, as SBST signed over the assets to be specifically under HGDEP, as the knowledge from LTA’s standpoint is “I am strictly running Sengkang-Hougang based on HGDEP and not from AMDEP”, which is also why if the BYDs were to get into an accident, HGDEP will have to be held accountable instead of AMDEP.

Take Service 25 for an example, it is under Bedok Bus Package, but run by AMDEP due to ease the load off BNDEP.

Hope it clarifies.

RE: sgWiki Buses Huge Table

Hi there,

I think that the new layout for the bus livery is rather quite unique, but definitely much better than the previous method of displaying the livery type.

Regards,
Themystery

Re: Bus Service Pages

Ok Supernutorcrazy, I understand your message about the format in Bus Service pages. I will do that when creating the next Bus Service page. Thanks.

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 23 December 2024, 17:25

Nearby Attraction issues

Hey, do people even add nearby attractions, schools, malls, etc. editiors just add train stations and not care, is it still even right to use the term "Nearby Attractions" or should it be "Train Stations".

Opposition to new trial operator format (MAN A24, Yutong E12)

I'm here to voice my profound opposition to the new operator format as trialled on the MAN A24 and Yutong E12 pages. The new format forces readers to make a new intrepretation as to which operator operates which buses, instead of being clear from the start with the operator logos. Furthermore and perhaps more importantly, unlike the original format, which utilises logos which is easily differentiable for everyone, the new format of putting red and green together is not friendly to those who are colourblind, in particular red-green colour blindness (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congenital_red%E2%80%93green_color_blindness) who see them as the same colour (green), which would make them think for example SMB8014T, SMB8015R and SMB8016M are under the same operator (TTS), even though in reality they're not. I know a friend who's interested in buses (though not active within the enthusiasts circle) and also has colour blindedness, and the new format would put him in a disadvantaged position. You mentioned your goal is to make SGWiki more accessible to everyone. Not making it red-green colourblind friendly, even though that is most likely not your intention, goes directly against that, and I thus urge you to reconsider your position.
Regards, TTEDC

Feeder Services Pages

Hi, this page should be deleted.

https://sgwiki.com/wiki/Pasir_Ris_Feeder_Services_354_-_359

Re: Bus Service Pages

Hi, I would prefer the previous format because I can read it from left to right the info,

the new format is more reading top to down which may take some time to understand. Cheers.

My Opinion on Bus Service Pages

While the new content at Service 168 provides neatness and tidyness with centering of text, the old format is still fine with me, as now we are used to the styling and content text. New format would take more time needed to glance the info. Thanks.

Bus Service 298 Fleet Trial

Please consider quantity of a particular bus model to make it easier for people to count and add a link to bus model pages to navigate easily.

Bus Service 168

Hi bro,

Just wanna say new format looks good, but it is slightly missing a few items. Would be nice if we can bring back the number of buses back. You might want to consider adding the number of buses for a specific model back into the page, just like the services which did not have a page in sgWiki.

Instead of “MAN ND323F”, maybe we can put something like “24 MAN ND323F”. (Specific model details are not required, just the amount of buses per model. Also, can consider shifting the table to the center, would help the people with OCD.

Thanks.

Reply

Sorry for the late message because I was away for 2 days, however, I really like the new format you put on Bus Service 168 page. But instead the number of buses might be wrong. Might need you to check on it again.

Thanks,

Alphabetlorefan1 (talk) 8 January 2025, 16:37

editing BRBP to AMDEP in former deployments

Hi,

As BRBP is an overnight parking bus park, I would suggest those former deployments for BRBP to be edited to AMDEP because BRBP parent depot control was formerly under AMDEP before being given to HGDEP due to the permanent closure.

For example BRBP 60, BRBP 90, BRBP 141 etc to AMDEP 60, AMDEP 90, AMDEP 141 etc

Thanks.